On 2014-06-09 23:04, Peter Grehan wrote:
Still seeing that a 2 CPU VM is using about 100% of 1 cpu when idleing,
but that is another minor challenge.
Fixed in r267305
Ack.
There is still a small difference in behaviour between Linux and
FreeBSD. But I'd call that negectable...
PID
Hi Peter,
Peter Grehan wrote:
Still seeing that a 2 CPU VM is using about 100% of 1 cpu when idleing,
but that is another minor challenge.
Fixed in r267305
Confirmed. Running a bhyved 3-vCPU-CentOS 6.5, the host CPU load for vcpu 0
is around 12% now. The remaining vcpus are all near or at
Hi Willem,
On 2014-06-09 23:04, Peter Grehan wrote:
Still seeing that a 2 CPU VM is using about 100% of 1 cpu when idleing,
but that is another minor challenge.
Fixed in r267305
Ack.
There is still a small difference in behaviour between Linux and
FreeBSD. But I'd call that
On 2014-06-10 15:59, Peter Grehan wrote:
Hi Willem,
On 2014-06-09 23:04, Peter Grehan wrote:
Still seeing that a 2 CPU VM is using about 100% of 1 cpu when idleing,
but that is another minor challenge.
Fixed in r267305
Ack.
There is still a small difference in behaviour between Linux
Hi Nils,
Confirmed. Running a bhyved 3-vCPU-CentOS 6.5, the host CPU load for vcpu 0
is around 12% now.
Doh, that's not good - haven't given Centos 6.5 a try; will now to
investigate this.
Ping times to the VM are fluctuating - ranging from 0.185ms to 35ms.
Hmmm, will look at that as
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy no...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Craig,
It's a little unfortunate that there's no stacktrace, though we can try
to see what's going on without it.
Could you please edit libvirtd.conf (should be something like
/usr/local/etc/libvirtd.conf if
On 2014-06-10 17:34, Peter Grehan wrote:
Hi Nils,
Confirmed. Running a bhyved 3-vCPU-CentOS 6.5, the host CPU load for
vcpu 0
is around 12% now.
Doh, that's not good - haven't given Centos 6.5 a try; will now to
investigate this.
All Ubuntus I have installed in VMs give more or less
Hi Peter,
Peter Grehan wrote:
Confirmed. Running a bhyved 3-vCPU-CentOS 6.5, the host CPU load for
vcpu 0 is around 12% now.
Doh, that's not good - haven't given Centos 6.5 a try; will now to
investigate this.
CentOS is a bit bitchy about booting from harddisk. You'll have to provide a
Hi Nils,
CentOS is a bit bitchy about booting from harddisk. You'll have to provide a
shorter linux-grub-line than what's written in the grub.conf-file; some-
thing like this:
linux /vmlinuz-2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 ro
root=/dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root
initrd
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy no...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Craig,
It's a little unfortunate that there's no stacktrace, though we can try
to see what's going on without it.
Could you please edit
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy no...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi Craig,
It's a little unfortunate that there's no stacktrace, though we can try
to see what's going on
Hi Willem,
I've got KTR compiled in, but last time I switched it on.
I got swamped in traffic, and I sort of got locked out of the server... :(
Could also be because I was writing it to a file as well.
So you'll have to help/tell me what to do.
For looking at this, I'd use one single-vCPU
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy no...@freebsd.org wrote:
This warning is not critical. Actually, UML should not be built on
FreeBSD and I would need to disable it by default. For now I think the
proper fix is to configure with '--without-uml' flag.
As for the segfault, I
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy no...@freebsd.org wrote:
This warning is not critical. Actually, UML should not be built on
FreeBSD and I would need to disable it by default. For now I think the
proper fix is to configure with '--without-uml'
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Roman Bogorodskiy no...@freebsd.org wrote:
This last line also sounds strange.
I'm wondering if you execute 'net-list --all' will you see the 'default'
network? And if it's there, will 'net-show default' should that
Autostart is enabled for it?
If I do:
#
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
# gdb /usr/local/sbin/libvirtd libvirtd.core
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
lldb /usr/local/sbin/libvirtd libvirtd.core
(lldb) bt
* thread #1: tid = 0, 0x000801aa8513
17 matches
Mail list logo
