Does that UEFI Firmware come with a way to running very old
things, e.g. DOS 6.2.2, Windows 3.11 or Windows 95?
Eventually :)
What's the timeline for bringing it into 11.0-CURRENT?
Headless operation will be supported shortly. The native graphics work
will take longer to trickle in.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/23/2015 20:24, Peter Grehan wrote:
Does that UEFI Firmware come with a way to running very old
things, e.g. DOS 6.2.2, Windows 3.11 or Windows 95?
Eventually :)
What's the timeline for bringing it into 11.0-CURRENT?
Headless
Hi Andriy,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 23/06/2015 05:37, Neel Natu wrote:
Hi Andriy,
FWIW I can boot up a Centos 7.1 virtual machine with 2 and 4 vcpus
fine on my host with 8 physical cores.
I have some questions about your setup inline.
On
On 23/06/2015 05:37, Neel Natu wrote:
Hi Andriy,
FWIW I can boot up a Centos 7.1 virtual machine with 2 and 4 vcpus
fine on my host with 8 physical cores.
I have some questions about your setup inline.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
If I run a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peter, Leo,
On 06/22/2015 22:12, Peter Grehan wrote:
Hi Leo,
Forgive my ignorance, but when you talk about the UEFI build I
don't suppose you mean that one must run the UEFI version of
FreeBSD, right? I assume you mean that bhyve is
On 23/06/2015 10:26, Neel Natu wrote:
Hi Andriy,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 23/06/2015 05:37, Neel Natu wrote:
Hi Andriy,
FWIW I can boot up a Centos 7.1 virtual machine with 2 and 4 vcpus
fine on my host with 8 physical cores.
I have some
