Am 01.12.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Jason Tubnor:
>
> On 1 December 2017 at 08:29, Kai Gallasch mailto:k...@free.de>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Last day an apache 2.4 running inside a Debian9 linux bhyve VM locked up
> on one of my servers (FreeBSD 11.1-RELENG, GENERIC kernel) overloading
Just as I was near one at the time, apparently ext4 is 4096 default
sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda
tune2fs 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Filesystem volume name: xdock
Last mounted on: /var/lib/docker
Filesystem UUID: b1dd0790-970d-4596-9192-49c704337015
Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53
Files
Accédez à Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/n/?aref=1512244645429565&medium=email&mid=55f609b517e6bG45580756G55f60e4e7813dG32b&bcode=2.1512244647.AbzZiyeOP0ek915if3Q&n_m=freebsd-virtualization%40freebsd.org&lloc=2nd_cta
Afficher les notifications
https://w
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 20:02 Rodney W. Grimes <
> freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>
> > > On 02/12/2017 08:11, Dustin Wenz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The commit history shows that chyves defaults to -S if you are
> > > > hosting from FreeBSD 10.3 or later. I'm sure they had a reason for
>
There was a standards group but now the interfaces used buy the Linux
virtio drivers define the de facto standard. As virtual interfaces go
they're fairly decent. So all we need is a backend.
The one thing FreeBSD doesn't have that I miss is CPU hot plug when running
as a guest - or at least a mec
On 12/02/2017 00:23, Dustin Wenz wrote:
> I have noticed significant storage amplification for my zvols; that could
> very well be the reason. I would like to know more about why it happens.
>
> Since the volblocksize is 512 bytes, I certainly expect extra cpu overhead
> (and maybe an extra 1k
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 00:23, Dustin Wenz wrote:
>> I have noticed significant storage amplification for my zvols; that could
>> very well be the reason. I would like to know more about why it happens.
>>
>> Since the volblocksize is 512 bytes, I certain
On 3 Dec. 2017 12:21, "K. Macy" wrote:
>
> Storage amplification usually has to do with ZFS RAID-Z padding. If your
> ZVOL block size does not make sense with your disk sector size, and
> RAID-Z level, you can get pretty silly numbers.
That's not what I'm talking about here. If your volblocksize
On 2017-12-02 20:21, K. Macy wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>> On 12/02/2017 00:23, Dustin Wenz wrote:
>>> I have noticed significant storage amplification for my zvols; that could
>>> very well be the reason. I would like to know more about why it happens.
>>>
>>> Sin
