Re: Vimage next step

2009-02-20 Thread Marko Zec
On Friday 20 February 2009 00:26:21 Julian Elischer wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: I've been doing performance testing on the 'non-vimage' 'structified' case VS the original 'globals' case and have not been able to see any really significant differences (though I have seen very slight

Re: how to move physical interface into multiple vimage interfaces

2009-04-02 Thread Marko Zec
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:43:57 subbsd wrote: Hello maillist i fetch and apply latest http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/vimage-20081015.tgz patches for 7.2 i386 for testing vimage. Hi, if you're running 7.2-PRERELASE or similar you'll probably have more luck trying out the latest sys

Re: Kernel Compiled with options VIMAGE panics on boot

2009-05-10 Thread Marko Zec
On Sunday 10 May 2009 16:41:52 Sevan / Venture37 wrote: Hi I've installed a fresh copy of this months snapshot, updated src via cvsup, made a copy of the GENERIC config file, added 'options VIMAGE' 'nooptions SCTP' compiled installed it, on boot the system panics with the error: panic: in

Re: Imunes and FreeBSD 8.0 RC2

2009-11-11 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 09 November 2009 11:37:41 Huth, Hans-Peter wrote: Hi, i have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 RC2 and wanted to play around with imunes/vimage, but i couldn't find it in the installed version (from DVD ISO). Did i just missed something, or what do i have to install something in

Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty

2010-11-17 Thread Marko Zec
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 06:57:53 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: Hi, first of all freebsd-virtualization@ is the better list for this; Cc:ed. We are using FreeBSD + VIMAGE at work, and we have seen an annoying problem : there seems to be a memory

Re: if_bridge VIMAGE patch

2011-01-13 Thread Marko Zec
On Thursday 13 January 2011 13:42:30 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Hi, Please, review the attached patch. It is against yesterday's HEAD and it virtualizes if_bridge. You can use the bridgetest script to create quickly a topology with redundant links to test STP. Looks good to me, though I'm

Re: vnet: acessing module's virtualized global variables from another module

2011-05-09 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 09 May 2011 19:05:28 Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Mon, 9 May 2011 16:21:15 +0200 Marko Zec wrote: MZ On Monday 09 May 2011 14:48:25 Mikolaj Golub wrote: Hi, Trying ipfw_nat under VIMAGE kernel I got this panic on the module load: MZ Hi, MZ I think the problem here

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 10:53:18 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Monday 05 March 2012 22:14:45 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: Hi, I am a very happy VIMAGE user. But lately I have been having problems using it, and its too

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
this helps, Marko Adrian On 6 March 2012 07:33, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 10:53:18 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Monday 05 March 2012 22:14:45 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: Hi, I am a very

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 20:49:38 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: I added VNET_DEBUG and noticed this warning (original scan_task code): CURVNET_SET() recursion in sosend() line 1350, prev in kern_kldload() 0xfe0002202c40 - 0xfe0002202c40 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper()

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:29:32 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:13:00 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: I am confused so whats the difference between having wlan in kernel config or not? Cuase that seems

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:30:26 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:29:32 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:13:00 Monthadar Al

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:45:40 Marko Zec wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:30:26 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:29:32 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:49:56 Adrian Chadd wrote: Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're building modules w/ VNET? Yes that's it, the VNET stuff resolves (mostly) to whitespace when options VIMAGE is not on! Marko ___

Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic

2012-03-06 Thread Marko Zec
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:52:43 Adrian Chadd wrote: On 6 March 2012 13:51, Marko Zec z...@fer.hr wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:49:56 Adrian Chadd wrote: Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're building modules w/ VNET? Yes that's it, the VNET stuff

Re: vimage tool crash when deleting a jail @netisr_process_workstream_proto

2012-04-25 Thread Marko Zec
On Wednesday 25 April 2012 14:08:48 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: Hi, Not sure if I should post this on virt or jail. I am not sure about this, but I thought it was an amd64 specific thing (had posted about it some time ago), but now I also get a panic on i386. What is weird is that if I add

Re: VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor

2013-07-22 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 22 July 2013 08:57:43 Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path? I'm not sure about

Re: VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor

2013-07-22 Thread Marko Zec
On Monday 22 July 2013 21:01:31 Adrian Chadd wrote: Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here. So - what's the right behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet tag/state is set? To the best of my knowledge,

Re: De-virtualize V_pf_mtag_z to eliminate kernel panics.

2013-07-27 Thread Marko Zec
/00140 5.html I reported multiple PF-related panics when VIMAGE was enabled in my kernel config. In these posts: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2013-July/00141 3.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2013-July/00142 0.html Marko Zec seemed

Re: De-virtualize V_pf_mtag_z to eliminate kernel panics.

2013-07-27 Thread Marko Zec
On Saturday 27 July 2013 16:48:00 Adrian Chadd wrote: I'm happy keeping it virtual (it lets us do things like set per-vimage mbuf tag limits, and having per-vimage mbufs may be a useful long term stretch goal to have).. we just have to think about this stuff in more detail. The V_pf_mtag_z

Re: RFC: ipfw nat VIMAGE improvements

2013-08-14 Thread Marko Zec
On Sunday 11 August 2013 22:01:12 Mikolaj Golub wrote: Hi, I would like to commit this patch that fixes some issues related to ipfw nat module load/unload on VIMAGE featured system. Any comments, objections? Far from being an expert in ipfw, I'm worried that the proposed approach of

Re: RFC: ipfw nat VIMAGE improvements

2013-08-14 Thread Marko Zec
On Wednesday 14 August 2013 22:43:05 Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:28:31PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote: On Sunday 11 August 2013 22:01:12 Mikolaj Golub wrote: Hi, I would like to commit this patch that fixes some issues related to ipfw nat module load/unload on VIMAGE

Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?

2014-10-17 Thread Marko Zec
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:37:37 +0200 Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote: On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:27:28PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote: It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later due

Re: RFC: Enabling VIMAGE in GENERIC

2014-11-19 Thread Marko Zec
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:07:46 +0400 Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org wrote: ... Can we have some wiki/man/docs on how particular subsystem should interact with VNET first? This can probably help to make proper vnet fixes in less number of attempts :) For example, even

[Differential] [Updated] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

2015-07-19 Thread zec (Marko Zec)
zec added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944#62124, @robak wrote: I managed to crash freshly fetched and built 10-S today, with GENERIC+VIMAGE+RACCT while stopping a jail, attaching console screenshots. F183647: Screen Shot 2015-07-19 at 17.48.26.png