Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-29 Thread Matthias Gamsjager
I had always the impression that there are only a hand full of students to take up a task. But I might be wrong at that. so when given the choice of breaking the rule and let someone do it again vs nobody doing it I know that I would pick. On 25 March 2016 at 14:43, David Wimsey wrote: > Beca

Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-25 Thread Mihai Carabas
Hello, I didn't exclude my work on the port. I've only retreat my proposal for GSoC not to invalidate a student slot for FreeBSD. That's all. I'm still interested in all bhyve related projects. Thank you, Mihai On Mar 25, 2016 5:16 PM, "Allan Jude" wrote: > On 2016-03-25 09:55, Mihai Carabas

Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-25 Thread Allan Jude
On 2016-03-25 09:55, Mihai Carabas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:43 PM, David Wimsey wrote: >> Because there are other people in the world who want to participate as well >> and they deserve a chance too. Not a bad idea for Mihai to try something >> different either. >> >> Its not like the

Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-25 Thread Mihai Carabas
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:43 PM, David Wimsey wrote: > Because there are other people in the world who want to participate as well > and they deserve a chance too. Not a bad idea for Mihai to try something > different either. > > Its not like they don’t get enough applicants to fill all the slo

Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-25 Thread David Wimsey
Because there are other people in the world who want to participate as well and they deserve a chance too. Not a bad idea for Mihai to try something different either. Its not like they don’t get enough applicants to fill all the slots. > On Mar 25, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:

Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-25 Thread Matthias Gamsjager
I wonder why this rule even exist? Because apparently projects will not be done which seem a bigger issue when someone participating 3 times On 25 March 2016 at 11:50, Mihai Carabas wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Unfortunatelly I have to officially retreat my proposal from GSoC due > to the fact that

Re: [GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-25 Thread Mihai Carabas
Hi everyone, Unfortunatelly I have to officially retreat my proposal from GSoC due to the fact that I participated three times in the past and they added a new rule this year (you are not allowed to participate as a student if you have been in the program three times already), so I'm not eligible.

[GSoC-Proposal] Porting bhyve on an ARMv8 platform

2016-03-19 Thread Mihai Carabas
Hi everyone, My name is Mihai Carabas and I'm a third year student at PhD in University POLITEHNICA from Bucharest, Romania. After some discussions with Peter Grehan about next steps in bhyve-arm, I came with a GSoC proposal for the project "Porting bhyve an an ARMv8 platform" which is publicly av