Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-12-09 Thread John Nielsen
On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox >> wrote: >>> I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a >>> timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-26 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I would be using such a patch as soon as it was available. On a friend's advice, I upgraded a ZFS server here at home with an AMD 9590 and 32Gig of RAM. I'd dearly like to use it to track down the netgraph bug (see my other recent posts), but it doesn't currently qualify. On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-25 Thread Neel Natu
Hi, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a > timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? > It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in mind. I'll guess that it'll be towards

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-25 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault wrote: > After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new > issues or unknowns what so ever. Everything that

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-19 Thread Benjamin Perrault
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new issues or unknowns what so ever. Everything that worked before still works now ( and a few bugs from fixed from HEAD ). Thus, I have gone ahead and pushed r273182 w/ Neel’s patch out to about 80 of the assorted AMD boxes in

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-19 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 16-10-2014 5:00, Anish Gupta wrote: > Hi all, > > The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. > > This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD > processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD > processor since 2010 will have the feat

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-16 Thread Benjamin Perrault
I’ve applied Neel’s patch against r273182 and am currently abusively testing it on a mix of HP DL385s w/ dual Opteron 6378SE, & Single socket AMD G34s ( some with Opteron 6200s, some with 6300s ), about 15 boxes in total - so far so good. Seriously awesome work Gentlemen. cheers, -bp > On Oc

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-15 Thread Matthew Grooms
Fantastic news! Greatly appreciated. -Matthew On Oct 15, 2014 10:00 PM, Anish Gupta wrote: > > Hi all, > > The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. > > This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD > processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pre

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-15 Thread Allan Jude
On 2014-10-15 23:00, Anish Gupta wrote: > Hi all, > > The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. > > This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD > processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD > processor since 2010 will have the fea

HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-15 Thread Anish Gupta
Hi all, The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD processor since 2010 will have the features required by bhyve. bhyve on AMD supports (almos