Hello Roger,
here are the results. I’ve tested FreeBSD 9.2, 10.0-RC5 in conjunction with XEN
PVHVM,XEN-QEMU-DM, KVM-VirtIO and the bare metal performance of the hosts,
every run respectively with file IO via raw images and block IO via LVM
volumes. Each VM ran with 1GB of memory and 1 VCPU. The
On 17/01/14 10:17, Sydney Meyer wrote:
> I’m doing some benchmarks with bonnie and dd on the Variations
> 9.2/10.0;PVHVM/VirtIO;fileio/blockio. I will post the results here to this
> thread.
By VirtIO I guess you mean emulated IO? That sounds great, I'm eager to
see the results :)
Roger.
__
I’m doing some benchmarks with bonnie and dd on the Variations
9.2/10.0;PVHVM/VirtIO;fileio/blockio. I will post the results here to this
thread.
On 17.01.2014, at 10:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 16/01/14 19:38, Sydney Meyer wrote:
>> Well then, thanks for the hint.. dmesg shows the followi
On 16/01/14 19:38, Sydney Meyer wrote:
> Well then, thanks for the hint.. dmesg shows the following:
>
> Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: at
> device/vif/0 on xenbusb_front0
> Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: Ethernet address: 00:16:3e:df:1b:5a
> Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xenbusb_back0:
Well then, thanks for the hint.. dmesg shows the following:
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: at device/vif/0
on xenbusb_front0
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: Ethernet address: 00:16:3e:df:1b:5a
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xenbusb_back0: on xenstore0
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: ba
On 16/01/14 17:41, Sydney Meyer wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> does someone know how to check if the paravirtualized I/O drivers from Xen
> are loaded/working in FreeBSD 10? To my understanding it isn't necessary
> anymore to compile a custom kernel with PVHVM enabled, right? In
> /var/log/messag
