Re: VIMAGE vs SysV IPC
Bjoern, > There’s a patch floating around. We still hope to have the VNET teardown, the VIMAGE framework in for 11 and put that one on top of all this. Fingers crossed. OK, thanks for the information. Best regards, -- DoubleF ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: VIMAGE vs SysV IPC
> On 02 Mar 2016, at 14:53 , Sergey Zakharchenko> wrote: > > Hello, > > As far as I can tell, jails still do not properly encapsulate SysV > IPC. Should I look into VIMAGE or is situation the same there? There’s a patch floating around. We still hope to have the VNET teardown, the VIMAGE framework in for 11 and put that one on top of all this. Fingers crossed. /bz ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
VIMAGE vs SysV IPC
Hello, As far as I can tell, jails still do not properly encapsulate SysV IPC. Should I look into VIMAGE or is situation the same there? Best regards, -- DoubleF ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"