Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>> for everything else, the larger register set on amd64 will matter more,
>> and you should probably use a 64-bit guest.
>
> There is an opinion that 64-bit systems use up more resources than
> 32-bit ones for the same tasks, it that not true?
it's not
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386
>> > or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of
>> > RAM?
>>
>> if you're running bind9, the sizeof(void *) will
Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> >
> > When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386
> > or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of
> > RAM?
>
> if you're running bind9, the sizeof(void *) will dominate your heap
> size, and a 32-bit guest will be better o
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386
> or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of
> RAM?
if you're running bind9, the sizeof(void *) will dominate your heap
size, and a 32-bit guest will be bette
Colleagues,
When I must run several FreeBSD guests in bhyve, should I prefer i386
or amd64 guests provided a guest will never need more than 2-3 GB of
RAM?
The bhyve host is of course amd64.
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru
