Chadd wrote:
Well, step #1 would be to run the freebsd-9 ath(4) driver in the later
freebsd version. If you're able to shoehorn that in, let's see if
that's the case.
-a
On 1 August 2014 02:20, Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to disable ANI ?
How should we go
0 0 0 12 0 0 28
6M
201 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 29
6M
400 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 27
6M
On Thursday 31 July 2014 16:01:56 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 31 July 2014 14:56, Johann
Hi
After an upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0 to 11.0 I'm losing comms to some of the wifi
clients that worked when I was using FreeBSD 9.0 (long distance links in mesh)
On CURRENT the devices are still showing with list sta, but the idle counter
keeps growing + no comms to them.
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE
1012 rx0
[1] tx0 rx13114
The RSSI's look fine. So there's likely something else odd going on
-a
On 31 July 2014 13:00, Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za wrote:
Hi
After an upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0 to 11.0 I'm losing comms to some of the
wifi
clients
beacons received
28 average rssi (beacons only)
Antenna profile:
[0] tx 641 rx3
[1] tx0 rx 8487
-a
On 31 July 2014 14:14, Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2014 13:43:34 Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think the idle counter
and not on older ones with an Atheros 5413 chipset.
-a
On 31 July 2014 14:14, Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2014 13:43:34 Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think the idle counter there is the receive idle counter. Ie, it's
not hearing frames from them
Hi
Is half/quarter width working for Atheros 5413 (looks like it) ?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath_hal(4)/HalfQuarterRate
Will the output of ifconfig -v wlan2 show if it is supported ?
Is it supported in FreeBSD 9.0 or do I need to upgrade to CURRENT ?
Do I need compile time flags/options
Which vendors are you talking about. Are you planing to add support for any of
them.
We have a UHF wifi pilot project and was thinking of doing a frequency down
convert to UHF.
Johann
On Monday 22 July 2013 10:35:27 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Well, the UHF stuff is available now and vendors are
On Sunday, December 09, 2012 04:18:45 PM Adrian Chadd wrote:
Ok, I've just taught the aggressive mode logic about IBSS. It's pretty
dirty - I may cop some hate for enabling aggressive mode for IBSS as
each IBSS node doesn't know about the overall voice/video data rates.
That's how it works in
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 01:58:38 AM Adrian Chadd wrote:
Here's what I have trimmed this down to so far:
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20121212-11n-ibss-and-other-stuff-3.di
ff
Please disable ampdu for now (ifconfig wlanX -ampdu) as it just plain
doesn't work.
I'll figure
On Sunday 18 November 2012 23:05:44 adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [ath] ath1: bad series0 hwrate 0x0, tries 1 ts_status 0x0
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: adrian
State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 18 21:04:51 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
This was fixed in r243047,
The following reply was made to PR kern/172955; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org,
jh...@meraka.csir.co.za
Subject: misc/172955: [ath] 11n does not work in adhoc mode
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:19
address. It's
quite useful to see what's actually going on. :-)
Adrian
On 22 September 2012 01:20, Johann Hugo jh...@meraka.csir.co.za wrote:
On Saturday 22 September 2012 02:05:23 Derrick Edwards wrote:
Thanks again for looking into this.
My main concern was the range
13 matches
Mail list logo
