Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Hm, paste the relevant dmesg lines from the boot into here? I'll reboot into an AR9287 today and see what happened. Thanks, Adrian On 18 April 2013 06:25, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Hi > I just updated to FreeBSD-current and found that the WiFi does not work on my > laptop. > ifconfig wla

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

See attached Preloaded elf obj module "/boot/kernel/if_ath.ko" at 0x80d2aef8. Preloaded elf obj module "/boot/kernel/if_ath_pci.ko" at 0x80d2db10. ath0: mem 0xe050-0xe050 irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10 ath0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps ath0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbp

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Ok, no obvious errors during scanning that would explain this. Hm! I'll stick an AR9287 in a test laptop today and give it a whirl. Adrian On 18 April 2013 06:41, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > See attached > > > > > > Preloaded elf obj module "/boot/kernel/if_ath.ko" at 0x80d2aef8. > >

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

I've just tested -HEAD on a WB197 (AR9287 + bluetooth.) It works fine. I think it's very likely something to do with the bus enumeration. Can you do a vmstat -i, see if you've seen any ath interrupts? adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing li

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

No interrupts at all: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 474 1 irq9: acpi0 95 0 irq22: ehci1 504 1 irq23: ehci01037 3 irq256: hpet0:t0

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Sigh. Someone's broken the bus or interrupt handling code between -9 and -head. Or ACPI, for all I know. It may even be something to do with RFKILL. Can you please boot verbosely, both on -9 and -head? you don't have to do anything - just capture the logfile /var/run/dmesg.boot and attach them he

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? HEAD: pcib2: irq 18 at device 28.2 on pci0 pcib0: allocated type 3 (0xe050-0xe05f) for rid 20 of pcib2 pcib2: domain0 pcib2: secondary bus 10 pcib2: subordinate bus 10 pcib2: memory decode 0xe050-0xe

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS wrote into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies about which interrupts are us

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

... Why would it differ for the same machine, different kernel? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 8:40 AM, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? Only t

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision. On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? > >

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On head? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision.   On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Yes On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:30:33 Adrian Chadd wrote: On head? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T Artyom MirgorodskiyOn Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM, wrote: I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working WiFi. I'll try to find a bro

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Hm, so -HEAD everything else except the wifi code? That's really odd. I updated to -HEAD this morning just to test the AR9287 for you and it was peachy! Adrian On 18 April 2013 10:36, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Yes > > > > On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:30:33 Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On head? >

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Yes, HEAD everything else except the wifi code (ath). Last working revision is 247286. So problem in revision 247287. On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:42:15 Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hm, so -HEAD everything else except the wifi code? > > That's really odd. I updated to -HEAD this morning just to test th

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:41:53 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: > > ... Why would it differ for the same machine, different kernel? I can't tell you why, but if you compare the full dmesg's you will see that several devices all changed their BIOS-assigned IRQs because the BIOS decided to shuffle the

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On 18 April 2013 11:58, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Yes, HEAD everything else except the wifi code (ath). > > Last working revision is 247286. So problem in revision 247287. That's really odd. It behaves perfectly fine on my system. You've tested 247287 and it breaks? Adrian _

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Yes. I tested 247287 and it breaks. On Thursday 18 April 2013 13:31:29 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 18 April 2013 11:58, Artyom Mirgorodskiy > wrote: > > Yes, HEAD everything else except the wifi code (ath). > > > > Last working revision is 247286. So problem in revision 247287. > > That's really od

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On 18 April 2013 13:33, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Yes. I tested 247287 and it breaks. Hm. Well, not much changed there. Try going to 247287 (ie, the broken revision), but revert head/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ar5416/ar5416_xmit.c to 247286. See if that fixes it. Adrian

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Did not work. On Thursday 18 April 2013 13:58:23 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 18 April 2013 13:33, Artyom Mirgorodskiy > wrote: > > Yes. I tested 247287 and it breaks. > > Hm. > > Well, not much changed there. > > Try going to 247287 (ie, the broken revision), but revert > head/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On 18 April 2013 14:43, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Did not work. > Hm. Ok. Let's add some debugging: inside of ar5416SetChainMasks(), let's add a printf() at the -end- of the function: ath_hal_printf(ah, "%s: txchainmask=0x%x, rxchainmask=0x%x\n", __func__, AH5416(ah)->ah_tx_chainmask, AH541

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On 18 April 2013 15:07, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > See attached > What the hell? Those masks are really wrong. Try adding this line after it: ath_hal_printf(ah, "%s: pcap rx=0x%x, tx=0x%x; configured rx=0x%x, tx=0x%x\n", __func__, pCap->halRxChainMask, pCap->halTxChainMask, rx_chainmask, tx_c

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Hm! I wonder.. Edit if_athvar.h - change sc_rxchainmask and sc_txchainmask in ath_softc to be uint32_t, rather than int. See if that helps. Adrian On 18 April 2013 15:20, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > See attached > > > > On Thursday 18 April 2013 15:08:36 Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 18 April

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

On 18 April 2013 15:54, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Nothing :( Ok, so I wonder now whether we're actually getting the right chainmask at startup. edit if_ath.c, look for 'ath_hal_getrxchainmask()' After the rx/tx chainmask is fetched,a dd this: device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "%s: RX chainmask=0x%x

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Nothing :( On Thursday 18 April 2013 15:22:49 Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hm! I wonder.. > > Edit if_athvar.h - change sc_rxchainmask and sc_txchainmask in > ath_softc to be uint32_t, rather than int. > > See if that helps. > > > > Adrian > > On 18 April 2013 15:20, Artyom Mirgorodskiy > wrote: >

ath-hal compilation error

Hello! I just wanted to notice, that Adrian's ath-hal git repository still has one error, which prevents building of ath-hal with clang. /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/ath_hal/ar9003/ar9300_radio.c:90:27: error: unused variable 'ichan' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable] HAL_CHANNEL_INTERNAL *i

Re: ath-hal compilation error

Is this with or without AH_DEBUG ? Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 6:43 PM, Mike wrote: Hello! I just wanted to notice, that Adrian's ath-hal git repository still has one error, which prevents building of ath-hal with clang. /usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../

Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Ok. I'll add some tidyups to head tonight and then add some more verbose logging. I don't have any 64 bit machines to test ar9287 on atm. Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 3:52 PM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: Nothing :(   On Thursday 18 April 2013 15