Re: 11n in adhoc mode

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
Here's what I have trimmed this down to so far: http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20121212-11n-ibss-and-other-stuff-3.diff Please disable ampdu for now (ifconfig wlanX -ampdu) as it just plain doesn't work. I'll figure out why once I figure out the cleanest way to get this 11n IBSS stuff

Re: 11n in adhoc mode

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. hey, scratch that. 11n aggregation works in IBSS mode with my patch, at least on ath(4). I bet there's all kinds of weird subtle crap going on that we need to fix, but the basics are working. Adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [ath] Degraded throughput - adhoc mode

2012-12-12 Thread Johann Hugo
On Sunday, December 09, 2012 04:18:45 PM Adrian Chadd wrote: Ok, I've just taught the aggressive mode logic about IBSS. It's pretty dirty - I may cop some hate for enabling aggressive mode for IBSS as each IBSS node doesn't know about the overall voice/video data rates. That's how it works in

Re: 11n in adhoc mode

2012-12-12 Thread Johann Hugo
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 01:58:38 AM Adrian Chadd wrote: Here's what I have trimmed this down to so far: http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20121212-11n-ibss-and-other-stuff-3.di ff Please disable ampdu for now (ifconfig wlanX -ampdu) as it just plain doesn't work. I'll figure

Re: 11n in adhoc mode

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
: Here's what I have trimmed this down to so far: http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20121212-11n-ibss-and-other-stuff-3.di ff Please disable ampdu for now (ifconfig wlanX -ampdu) as it just plain doesn't work. I'll figure out why once I figure out the cleanest way to get this 11n

Re: kern/173898: [iwn] [patch] iwn(4) DOES support 6235 chip.

2012-12-12 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Saturday 01 December 2012 05:59:22 Eitan Adler wrote: On 30 November 2012 20:28, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: It's not that simple. Speak to bernhard. Davide, You mention some issues and I asked you to follow up to the PR. Can you please explain them? There are other

AR9285 not see n-channels

2012-12-12 Thread Andrey Fesenko
I have # uname -a FreeBSD beastie.mydomain.local 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r243259: Mon Nov 19 09:28:08 MSK 2012 root@beastie.mydomain.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/W_BOOK amd64 # grep ATH /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/W_BOOK options ATH_ENABLE_11N options ATH_DEBUG options

Re: AR9285 not see n-channels

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. yup, you're doing 11n! Welcome! Adrian On 12 December 2012 16:54, Andrey Fesenko f0and...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Yup. It's doing 11n rates. Compile and run athstats, it'll tell you how many aggregate frames are being

Re: AR9285 not see n-channels

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, The AR9285 is a 2GHz only NIC. The channel list shows 11b, 11bg, HT20 and HT40 channels. It all looks right, why don't you think it is? Adrian On 12 December 2012 17:32, Andrey Fesenko f0and...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: AR9285 not see n-channels

2012-12-12 Thread Andrey Fesenko
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The AR9285 is a 2GHz only NIC. The channel list shows 11b, 11bg, HT20 and HT40 channels. It all looks right, why don't you think it is? Adrian On 12 December 2012 17:32, Andrey Fesenko f0and...@gmail.com