Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? -adrian On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, Here is patch split 6. It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. Cedric

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Julio Merino
The following reply was made to PR kern/181100; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Julio Merino ju...@meroh.net To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, julio+host-mastodon-j...@meroh.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 12:40:56

RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Cedric GROSS
-Message d'origine- De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! THanks for the report! This is my fault. But, is bwi actually doing 11n rates? On 11 August 2013 09:50, Julio Merino ju...@meroh.net wrote: bwi0: firmware rev 0x0127, patch level 0x000e panic: rate 130 is basic/mcs? See, that's just odd. If it's a non-11n (MCS) rate, then it should

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. Right. But

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Julio Merino
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! THanks for the report! Hi Adrian, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. This is my fault. But, is bwi actually doing 11n rates? I don't know. Is there a way to tell for sure? This machine is from ~2005 so I

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Try call doadump and see what it does. I think bwi is non-11n. So somehow it's getting a rather .. large rate. -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Julio Merino
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Try call doadump and see what it does. No luck. That said Dumping 0 MB and didn't record anything... -- Julio Merino / @jmmv ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list