Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Kevin Lo
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:16:12PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 7 July 2014 12:10, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:48:36 -0700 > > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >> I'd just look at porting over the openbsd driver. There's no 11n > >> support in the openbsd code though

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
Sweet! Can you run the same commands above on the Avila board? Would you mind filing a PR to ensure we get that option into the relevant kernel(s) ? (I'm kinda tempted to suggest we auto-select the scaling factor at startup depending upon physical RAM .. ) -a On 7 July 2014 12:32, John Hay

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread John Hay
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:59:03AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 7 July 2014 11:28, John Hay wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:22:46AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>> On 7 July 2014 10:12, Ian Lepore wrote: > >>> > On Mon, 2014

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:16:12 -0700 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 July 2014 12:10, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:48:36 -0700 > > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >> I'd just look at porting over the openbsd driver. There's no 11n > >> support in the openbsd code though! > > > >

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 July 2014 12:10, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:48:36 -0700 > Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I'd just look at porting over the openbsd driver. There's no 11n >> support in the openbsd code though! > > That's bad, I hope that the 802.11n protocol will be implemented since

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:48:36 -0700 Adrian Chadd wrote: > I'd just look at porting over the openbsd driver. There's no 11n > support in the openbsd code though! That's bad, I hope that the 802.11n protocol will be implemented since it was released in 2009. What do you recommend to do? > > > -

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread hiren panchasara
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 July 2014 11:28, John Hay wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:22:46AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> On 7 July 2014 10:12, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 09:25 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> >> hi, >>> >> >>> >> That cal

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
I'd just look at porting over the openbsd driver. There's no 11n support in the openbsd code though! -a On 7 July 2014 11:46, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:23:52 -0700 > Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 7 July 2014 05:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >> > Hi people,

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:23:52 -0700 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 July 2014 05:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > Does anyone still work to porting the otus driver from OpenBSD? > > > > https://github.com/erikarn/otus/tree/master/otus > > Nope. I got stuck on trying to figur

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 July 2014 11:28, John Hay wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:22:46AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 7 July 2014 10:12, Ian Lepore wrote: >> > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 09:25 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> >> >> That call is returning ENOMEM. I'm not sure why. It allocated an mbuf

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread John Hay
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:22:46AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 July 2014 10:12, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 09:25 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> hi, > >> > >> That call is returning ENOMEM. I'm not sure why. It allocated an mbuf > >> fine, but it couldn't allocate the DMA ma

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 July 2014 05:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > Hi people, > > Does anyone still work to porting the otus driver from OpenBSD? > > https://github.com/erikarn/otus/tree/master/otus Nope. I got stuck on trying to figure out how to correctly implement the synchronous/asynchronous message qu

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 July 2014 10:12, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 09:25 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> hi, >> >> That call is returning ENOMEM. I'm not sure why. It allocated an mbuf >> fine, but it couldn't allocate the DMA map. >> >> What's the output of "vmstat -z" ? I wonder if it's failing an al

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 09:25 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > That call is returning ENOMEM. I'm not sure why. It allocated an mbuf > fine, but it couldn't allocate the DMA map. > > What's the output of "vmstat -z" ? I wonder if it's failing an allocation. > > > > -a Lack of bounce buffers

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread John Hay
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:25:34AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > That call is returning ENOMEM. I'm not sure why. It allocated an mbuf > fine, but it couldn't allocate the DMA map. > > What's the output of "vmstat -z" ? I wonder if it's failing an allocation. :~ # vmstat -z ITEM

Re: CAMBRIA and more than one atheros card

2014-07-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
hi, That call is returning ENOMEM. I'm not sure why. It allocated an mbuf fine, but it couldn't allocate the DMA map. What's the output of "vmstat -z" ? I wonder if it's failing an allocation. -a On 7 July 2014 07:25, John Hay wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'm further with getting my stuff working

TP-LINK TL-WN821N

2014-07-07 Thread Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina
Hi people, Does anyone still work to porting the otus driver from OpenBSD? https://github.com/erikarn/otus/tree/master/otus Regards, -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/

[Bugzilla] Commit Needs MFC

2014-07-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Hi, You have a bug in the "Needs MFC" state which has not been touched in 7 or more days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or marked it as completed. In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a comment and I won't remind you again