[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #14 from Adrian Chadd --- Hi, So the tx path grabs the rate from the net80211 ratectl code. The link_quality table controls which rates are tried in which order, and I think it's _after_ the rate that is specified by the rate

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #13 from Hiren Panchasara --- Adrian, I still couldn't find out where the "step up" in rates should happen and how it should look like. i.e. is there an array of speeds it should step up to? -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #12 from Hiren Panchasara --- Tried to follow the rabbit-hole to see where rate is coming from: Index: if_iwn.c === --- if_iwn.c(revision 269621) +++ if_iwn.c

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #11 from Hiren Panchasara --- where exactly should I be looking for to know the rate? I see following: Aug 24 15:43:44 flymockour-l7 kernel: iwn_tx_data: qid 0 idx 2 len 56 nsegs 2 rate 0083 plcp 0x4103 Aug 24 15:43:44 fl

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #10 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #9) > (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #6) > > Created attachment 146235 [details] > > wifi debug 1 > > Hm, so it drops all the way to MCS0 and then

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #9 from Adrian Chadd --- (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #6) > Created attachment 146235 [details] > wifi debug 1 Hm, so it drops all the way to MCS0 and then never tries a higher rate. I wonder why. -- You are rec

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #8 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #5) > Hiren - oh you went iperf from STA -> AP -> STA? That's going to suck for > lots of reasons. > > You should get more than 3mbit/sec iperfing STA->AP->eth

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #7 from Hiren Panchasara --- Created attachment 146236 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146236&action=edit wifi debug 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #6 from Hiren Panchasara --- Created attachment 146235 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146235&action=edit wifi debug 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #5 from Adrian Chadd --- Hiren - oh you went iperf from STA -> AP -> STA? That's going to suck for lots of reasons. You should get more than 3mbit/sec iperfing STA->AP->ethernet. Do this: * add IWN_DEBUG and IEEE80211_DEBUG t

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #4 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #3) > I did a simple iperf test where I ran client on wifi laptop and server on a > machine connected to lan in my network. I am seeing 3mbps/sec average. >

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN821N

Hi Kevin, Sometimes my wireless device fails to connect at boot, and I need to restart the system. Also it states that the device is not configured. /boot/loader.conf if_urtwn_load="YES" legal.realtek.license_ack=1 It shows the following output: urtwn0: timeout waiting for checksum report Any

Re: FreeBSD current RT3071 can't connect to 5G network

Sorry no. Kevin On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:42:34AM +0100, Miguel Clara wrote: > > Would hardware donation help? At least in you're case I mean :) > > > Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards > --- > *Miguel Clara* > *IT - Sys Admin & Developer

Re: WPI (Intel wireless 3945ABG) strange behaviour

> I was not aware rc.conf was so sensitive to white space ... > I even think it shouldn't. rc.conf script is run by /bin/sh, one can test syntax by typing : /bin/sh . /etc/rc.conf set Good luck. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #3 from Hiren Panchasara --- I did a simple iperf test where I ran client on wifi laptop and server on a machine connected to lan in my network. I am seeing 3mbps/sec average. % ifconfig wlan0 wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 150

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #2 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #1) > Ok, I'll start adding some more debugging to iwn(4) in HEAD and let you know > when I'm ready to debug this. I also have 6205: iwn0@pci0:3:0:0:cl

Account Blocked

Dear costumer, You have received this email because our system has noticed some suspicious activities with AÏÏle ID. All what you need to keep enjoying all the benefits of your id is to confirm your identity , follow the link below to start this process .