[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799

Andriy Voskoboinyk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||a...@freebsd.org

--- Comment #5 from Andriy Voskoboinyk  ---
Hi!

Try to apply fix from r283636 (there was similar issue with ndis(4)).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799

--- Comment #4 from josla...@student.liu.se ---
65536 is better than the current (broken) state.

I think we should ask mav since he seems to have a strong opinion on define
names ;).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

[bugzilla-noreply]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799

--- Comment #3 from Adrian Chadd  ---
Yeah, but those defines are to do with physical IO for disks, not for various
network cards.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"