Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 26 October 2012 06:18, Johann Hugo wrote: > And the difference between a 1x1 and a 2x2 802.11n adapter ? It's more complicated - since if you're not doing aggregation, the overheads per frame eat in to your efficiency % and when you're transmitting at high MCS or multiple streams, you don't n

Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-26 Thread Johann Hugo
On Friday 26 October 2012 14:56:42 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 26 October 2012 05:06, Johann Hugo wrote: > > Is this more or less the troughput what one should expect: > > > > a/20 = 29.7 Mbits/sec > > > > ht/20 = 40.6 Mbits/sec > > > > ht/40 = 44.1 Mbits/sec > > Those are around the expected thr

Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 26 October 2012 05:06, Johann Hugo wrote: > Is this more or less the troughput what one should expect: > a/20 = 29.7 Mbits/sec > > ht/20 = 40.6 Mbits/sec > > ht/40 = 44.1 Mbits/sec Those are around the expected throughput levels for 11n rates with no WMM and no aggregation. Adrian ___

Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-26 Thread Johann Hugo
On Monday 22 October 2012 16:09:50 you wrote: > On 22 October 2012 06:56, Johann Hugo wrote: > > Hi > > > > What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ? > > If you're hitting best possible circumstances? Almost 2x. > Is this more or less the troughput what one should

Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-22 Thread Adrian Chadd
2GHz is a bit flakier here because there's generally a lot more interference floating around. You just choose a primary channel and then say ht:40 . You don't get to choose upper or lower here - the standard requires you don't have overlapping 40MHz channels. (eg ifconfig wlan0 channel 6:ht/40)

Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-22 Thread Sven Hazejager
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ? > > If you're hitting best possible circumstances? Almost 2x. I think I checked earlier: what about ht/40 on 2.4GHz? How do I enable it and select the secondary channel?

Re: 11n channel width

2012-10-22 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 22 October 2012 06:56, Johann Hugo wrote: > Hi > > What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ? If you're hitting best possible circumstances? Almost 2x. Now, where's my IBSS HT bug? :) I can easily debug that stuff now. adrian > Johann > ___

11n channel width

2012-10-22 Thread Johann Hugo
Hi What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ? Johann ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@free