Hi, I've just committed some changes to -HEAD. Please update to the latest -HEAD and paste me the ath0 dmesg output. It will include the chainmask information. Thanks, Adrian ___ email@example.com mailing list
Adrian, I found the problem. I'm use ath as module, so ATH_ENABLE_11N is not defined. When I define ATH_ENABLE_11N - everything work. Artyom Mirgorodskiy On Friday 19 April 2013 13:27:21 wrote: Updated. However I did not see chainmask information. See attached On Friday 19 April 2013
Hi! Ok, please update to -HEAD and retest! adrian On 19 April 2013 06:26, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote: oo good to know! let me setup the chainmask info whether or not the 11n option is set. thanks! adrian On 19 April 2013 04:08, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Sigh. Someone's broken the bus or interrupt handling code between -9 and -head. Or ACPI, for all I know. It may even be something to do with RFKILL. Can you please boot verbosely, both on -9 and -head? you don't have to do anything - just capture the logfile /var/run/dmesg.boot and attach them
Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? HEAD: pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 18 at device 28.2 on pci0 pcib0: allocated type 3 (0xe050-0xe05f) for rid 20 of pcib2 pcib2: domain0 pcib2: secondary bus 10 pcib2: subordinate bus 10 pcib2: memory
On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS wrote into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies about which interrupts are
... Why would it differ for the same machine, different kernel? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T On Apr 18, 2013 8:40 AM, John Baldwin lt;j...@freebsd.orggt; wrote: On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: gt; Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas?