Re: ath (AR9280) with nanoBSD (fwd)

It was to remove the wifi interface from needing to be an ifnet interface, complete with the locking and lifecycle management. Now the net80211 physical interfaces don't have to pretend to be normal network interfaces. Which is good in the long run as there's a whole bunch of functionality to

Re: ath (AR9280) with nanoBSD (fwd)

> On 30 Jun 2016, at 21:02, Ian Smith wrote: > > Sorry Felix, didn't notice you hadn't cc'd the list .. hoping you don't > mind if I do, might save someone else from responding .. cheers, Ian Nope, that’s fine, I meant to but I forget all the time. Alpine, mutt and

Re: ath (AR9280) with nanoBSD (fwd)

Sorry Felix, didn't notice you hadn't cc'd the list .. hoping you don't mind if I do, might save someone else from responding .. cheers, Ian -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:52:43 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Felix Friedlander