[iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Cedric GROSS
Hello, Here is patch split 6. It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. Cedric pan.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? -adrian On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS wrote: > Hello, > > > > Here is patch split 6. > > > > It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. > > This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. > > > > Cedric > > >

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Julio Merino
The following reply was made to PR kern/181100; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Julio Merino To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, julio+host-mastodon-j...@meroh.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 12:40:56 -0400 I rebuilt a

RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Cedric GROSS
> -Message d'origine- > De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part > de Adrian Chadd > Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34 > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 > > Hi! > > What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed t

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! THanks for the report! This is my fault. But, is bwi actually doing 11n rates? On 11 August 2013 09:50, Julio Merino wrote: > bwi0: firmware rev 0x0127, patch level 0x000e > panic: rate 130 is basic/mcs? See, that's just odd. If it's a non-11n (MCS) rate, then it should be 2x the speed

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote: > U1 stand for unit 1. > As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within > iwn_vap_create. > > As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when > standard run will be ok. Right. But what's going on,

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Julio Merino
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > THanks for the report! Hi Adrian, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. > This is my fault. But, is bwi actually doing 11n rates? I don't know. Is there a way to tell for sure? This machine is from ~2005 so I don't think so,

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Try "call doadump" and see what it does. I think bwi is non-11n. So somehow it's getting a rather .. large rate. -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Julio Merino
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Try "call doadump" and see what it does. No luck. That said "Dumping 0 MB" and didn't record anything... -- Julio Merino / @jmmv ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: kern/181100: [bwi] Turning up bwi0 crashes / deadlocks the kernel

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Try this patch in sys/dev/bwi/ : Index: bwimac.c === --- bwimac.c(revision 254197) +++ bwimac.c(working copy) @@ -1427,6 +1427,12 @@ enum ieee80211_phytype modtype; uint16_t ofs; +