On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Now, ideally it'd actually check the channel for interference and
channel busy status, and use _that_ metric.
Ideally, it would attempt to get co-channel with other APs on the same channel.
Especially in 2.4GHz (or any of the
There is no 1, 6, 11 anymore. You're not listening.
Back in the day, the adjacent (1 on 6, 6 on 1, 11 on 6, 6 on 11)
channel rejection spec for 802.11b was 35dBm at 11Mbps modulation
There never was an alternate (1 on 11, 11 on 1) channel rejection spec
in the days of 802.11b.
Most decent
On Dec 21, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi!
Well, there's a bunch of updated intel hardware with mini-pcie slots.
I think pcengines just did a hardware refresh, for example?
It’s not done yet. ‘beta’ boards for the PC Engines “APU” platform
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:57 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
>
> Hi-
>
> I’m working on a proof-of-concept for a kind of networking swiss army knife.
> Can anyone suggest a board that meets the following requirements? CPU arch
> doesn’t matter as long as it will run FreeBSD (Atom,
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 2:39 PM, John Nielsen <li...@jnielsen.net> wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Jim Thompson <j...@netgate.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:57 PM, John Nielsen <li...@jnielsen.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
I'm one of the people behind the pfSense project. When upstream has
11ac support, we'll incorporate same.
(As you might imagine, Adrian and I know each other.)
Jim
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hi!
>
> I'm working on an ath10k port from