[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken after upgrade from 9 to 10

2016-11-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 Andriy Voskoboinyk changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken after upgrade from 9 to 10

2016-07-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|if_bwi broken |if_bwi broken

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

2016-07-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 Andriy Voskoboinyk changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

2016-07-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 --- Comment #4 from josla...@student.liu.se --- 65536 is better than the current (broken) state. I think we should ask mav since he seems to have a strong opinion on define names ;). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

2016-07-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 --- Comment #3 from Adrian Chadd --- Yeah, but those defines are to do with physical IO for disks, not for various network cards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

2016-07-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 Adrian Chadd changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 210799] if_bwi broken

2016-07-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210799 Bug ID: 210799 Summary: if_bwi broken Product: Base System Version: 10.3-RELEASE Hardware: ppc OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me