Tested, tidyed up and committed, thanks!
-adrian
On 9 August 2013 08:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 03:43, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>
>>> So please go and fix that!
>>
>> Done.
>
> Cool. I'll test this out on the 4965 and 5100 today/tomorrow and get
> back to you.
>
>
>
> -adrian
On 8 August 2013 03:43, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>> So please go and fix that!
>
> Done.
Cool. I'll test this out on the 4965 and 5100 today/tomorrow and get
back to you.
-adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
> -Message d'origine-
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 août 2013 07:14
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn] Review split 5
>
> Hiya!
>
Hiya!
So, you removed sc->broadcast_id and replaced it with
IWN5000_BROADCAST_ID. You need to undo that and go back to using
sc->broadcast_id; the broadcast id is different between the 4965 and
5000 (and later, I bet.)
So please go and fix that!
Thanks,
-adrian
(I'm going to spin up a 4965 n
edric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn] Review split 5
>
> .. so what's this PAN context stuff?
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 5 August 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is another
.. so what's this PAN context stuff?
-adrian
On 5 August 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Here is another split.
>
>
>
> This one update if_iwnvar.h with new structure for later but also modify
> iwn_softc for context selection.
>
> Context will be used later when PAN context w
