.. and yes, what I'd really like to do is find someone who wants to
look after "long distance links" with atheros hardware (and has the
kit to do so!) and help me fix up the coverage class code to work in a
more generic fashion, for all chips.
I can tell people what to do if they'd like to hack on
Ah. athctrl.sh ?
adrian
On 22 September 2012 02:04, Johann Hugo wrote:
> I'm still using a utility from Sam.
>
>
>
> athctrl -d 8000
>
> Setup IFS parameters on interface ath0 for 8000 meter p-2-p link
>
> dev.ath.0.slottime=36
>
> dev.ath.0.acktimeout=75
>
> dev.ath.0.ctstimeout=75
>
>
>
> A
I'm still using a utility from Sam.
athctrl -d 8000
Setup IFS parameters on interface ath0 for 8000 meter p-2-p link
dev.ath.0.slottime=36
dev.ath.0.acktimeout=75
dev.ath.0.ctstimeout=75
Are these settings still good ?
Are there any way do detect these automatically ?
Johann
On Saturday 22 Sep
I assume you've tweaked the ack, slot, rtsctstimeout?
The 11n rate control code is a little more jumpy. I've fixed that in
recent checkins. It's not optimal but now it's not as jumpy as before.
Update to -HEAD, then use 'athratestats' on the peer MAC address. It's
quite useful to see what's actua
On Saturday 22 September 2012 02:05:23 Derrick Edwards wrote:
> Thanks again for looking into this.
> My main concern was the range of network performance that I was getting
> when the laptop was right in front of the access point. As you can see
> bandwith varied greatly.
I don't know if it
On 21 September 2012 17:30, Derrick Edwards wrote:
> Wireless N, if any. Thanks for the info.
AR5416 and AR9280. I suggest the AR9280 if you can.
The later NICs (AR93xx, AR94xx, AR95xx) aren't supported at the
moment. I have working code here but I can't release it just yet.
Thanks,
Adrian
_
On Friday, September 21, 2012 08:24:27 PM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The AR9287 is a 2GHz only NIC.
>
>
>
> adrian
Thanks alot. I did not know that. What NIC supports both 2GHz and 5GHz
Wireless N, if any. Thanks for the info.
___
freebsd-wir
Hi,
The AR9287 is a 2GHz only NIC.
adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Friday, September 21, 2012 03:11:20 PM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> those results look fine, what's the problem exactly?
>
> Beforehand it was 2MBit/sec upload, now it's 50MBit/sec
> upload/download, that looks within expectations and close to what
> ath9k is getting.
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
>
Hiya,
those results look fine, what's the problem exactly?
Beforehand it was 2MBit/sec upload, now it's 50MBit/sec
upload/download, that looks within expectations and close to what
ath9k is getting.
Adrian
On 21 September 2012 04:01, Derrick Edwards wrote:
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 12:
On Friday, September 21, 2012 12:50:08 AM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Which iperf is upload and which is download?
>
> Can you run athstats during the transfer?
>
> Adrian
>
> On Sep 20, 2012 8:57 PM, "Derrick Edwards" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am utilizing an mini PCIE AR9287 mini PCI-E. It
Which iperf is upload and which is download?
Can you run athstats during the transfer?
Adrian
On Sep 20, 2012 8:57 PM, "Derrick Edwards" wrote:
> Hi,
> I am utilizing an mini PCIE AR9287 mini PCI-E. It is not performing as
> expected thus far. I utilized iperf to test speed from laptop
12 matches
Mail list logo
