Re: release or stable, for wifi

2014-02-11 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:31 +
John freebsd-li...@potato.growveg.org wrote:

 Hello list,
 
 Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The
 situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because
 it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of
 reliability. Wireless is provided by the ath0 driver.

I am on 10 since June/July 2012. It was HEAD then. I will stay with 10
as long as possible and the switch to the then HEAD. I do this since
many years and find it the easiest way for me.

Erich
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: release or stable, for wifi

2014-02-11 Thread John
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:39:43PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:31 +
 John freebsd-li...@potato.growveg.org wrote:
 
  Hello list,
  
  Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The
  situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because
  it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of
  reliability. Wireless is provided by the ath0 driver.
 
 I am on 10 since June/July 2012. It was HEAD then. I will stay with 10
 as long as possible and the switch to the then HEAD. I do this since
 many years and find it the easiest way for me.

I had a feeling this might be the case, thanks for confirming.

-- 
John
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org