Re: iwn: Intel Centrino 6205 bad 11n performance

2014-08-23 Thread Johannes Dieterich
Dear Adrian

thanks a lot for the suggestion! Removing ht indeed improves the throughput
to 1.7 MB/s. Still far from the maximum of my uplink but sufficient for the
time being and much improved.

Concerning the non-existing maintainer: does it in this case even make
sense to file a PR?

Given how common the Intel WLAN NICs (unfortunately) are and how some
notebooks have white lists making a change to e.g. ath impossible, it is a
real bummer that nobody maintains it. Thanks for your work on ath, btw,
those NICs are working great nowadays!

Thanks again for the help!

Johannes


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:

 Hi,

 You can try disabling 11n (ifconfig -ht) but besides that, there's no
 real iwn maintainer or anyone who wants to get really nitty gritty
 into what the driver is doing. So until that happens, I think we're
 short of luck. :(


 -a


 On 19 August 2014 12:53, Johannes Dieterich dieterich@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Dear all,
 
  I have a Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 WLAN NIC in my Thinkpad using
 iwn.
 
  iwn0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x13118086 chip=0x00858086
 rev=0x34
  hdr=0x00
  vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
  device = 'Centrino Advanced-N 6205 [Taylor Peak]'
  class  = network
 
  Unfortunately, I only get a rather bad speed using CURRENT (r270098) out
 of
  the chip. It is connected to an 11n (on the 2.4 GHz band) network:
 
  wlan0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
 1500
  nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
  media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11ng
  status: associated
  ssid X channel 4 (2427 MHz 11g ht/20) bssid XX
  country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF
  TKIP 2:128-bit txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl
 300
  bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 64k
  ampdudensity 8 -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme roaming MANUAL
 
  I get a maximum of 900 KB/s of throughput (both in/out, approximated by
  copying a large file using scp), within the network and to the outside
  world. Running SuSE Linux on the notebook allows me to easily saturate my
  uplink at  3MB/s, didn't then further check within the network. I get no
  log messages on FBSD from iwn and I am not located in a particularly
 noisy
  neighborhood.
 
  The only performance issue I can find with this chip is one old report on
  Ubuntu (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1949571), where the 11n
  seemed to be the culprit in the driver/firmware. Could this be an issue
 for
  us as well (firmware problem?)?
 
  As my workhorse is FreeBSD, I'd love to fix this issue. How can I further
  debug this issue and/or provide more data? I know that the status of iwn
 in
  FBSD is difficult ATM but maybe there is hope?
 
  Best
 
  Johannes
  ___
  freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: iwn: Intel Centrino 6205 bad 11n performance

2014-08-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
Please file a PR. I may end up getting around to it.

I don't know whether it's 11n TX or 11n RX, but we should really debug it.


-a


On 23 August 2014 12:19, Johannes Dieterich dieterich@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear Adrian

 thanks a lot for the suggestion! Removing ht indeed improves the throughput
 to 1.7 MB/s. Still far from the maximum of my uplink but sufficient for the
 time being and much improved.

 Concerning the non-existing maintainer: does it in this case even make sense
 to file a PR?

 Given how common the Intel WLAN NICs (unfortunately) are and how some
 notebooks have white lists making a change to e.g. ath impossible, it is a
 real bummer that nobody maintains it. Thanks for your work on ath, btw,
 those NICs are working great nowadays!

 Thanks again for the help!

 Johannes


 On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:

 Hi,

 You can try disabling 11n (ifconfig -ht) but besides that, there's no
 real iwn maintainer or anyone who wants to get really nitty gritty
 into what the driver is doing. So until that happens, I think we're
 short of luck. :(


 -a


 On 19 August 2014 12:53, Johannes Dieterich dieterich@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Dear all,
 
  I have a Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 WLAN NIC in my Thinkpad using
  iwn.
 
  iwn0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x13118086 chip=0x00858086
  rev=0x34
  hdr=0x00
  vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
  device = 'Centrino Advanced-N 6205 [Taylor Peak]'
  class  = network
 
  Unfortunately, I only get a rather bad speed using CURRENT (r270098) out
  of
  the chip. It is connected to an 11n (on the 2.4 GHz band) network:
 
  wlan0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
  1500
  nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
  media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11ng
  status: associated
  ssid X channel 4 (2427 MHz 11g ht/20) bssid XX
  country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF
  TKIP 2:128-bit txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl
  300
  bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 64k
  ampdudensity 8 -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme roaming MANUAL
 
  I get a maximum of 900 KB/s of throughput (both in/out, approximated by
  copying a large file using scp), within the network and to the outside
  world. Running SuSE Linux on the notebook allows me to easily saturate
  my
  uplink at  3MB/s, didn't then further check within the network. I get
  no
  log messages on FBSD from iwn and I am not located in a particularly
  noisy
  neighborhood.
 
  The only performance issue I can find with this chip is one old report
  on
  Ubuntu (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1949571), where the 11n
  seemed to be the culprit in the driver/firmware. Could this be an issue
  for
  us as well (firmware problem?)?
 
  As my workhorse is FreeBSD, I'd love to fix this issue. How can I
  further
  debug this issue and/or provide more data? I know that the status of iwn
  in
  FBSD is difficult ATM but maybe there is hope?
 
  Best
 
  Johannes
  ___
  freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org