Unfortunately, the storm is still there with this patch.
On 2015-5-15, at 18:28, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
El 15/05/15 a les 16.42, Eggert, Lars ha escrit:
On 2015-5-15, at 16:35, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
Yes, but I've realized that isci for example
El 18/05/15 a les 15.04, Eggert, Lars ha escrit:
Hi,
I'm trying to boot a Xen dom0 on another machine (Fujitsu RX308) and Xen
crashes when starting the kernel. Log below; any ideas?
Thanks,
Lars
B2
__
Hi,
I'm trying to boot a Xen dom0 on another machine (Fujitsu RX308) and Xen
crashes when starting the kernel. Log below; any ideas?
Thanks,
Lars
B2
__ _ _
| | | _
El 18/05/15 a les 15.01, Eggert, Lars ha escrit:
Unfortunately, the storm is still there with this patch.
I guess you will have to resort to using
hw.isci.force_legacy_interrupts=1 until I get around to implement MSI-X
support for Xen Dom0, sorry for the trouble.
Roger.
On 2015-5-18, at 15:39, Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com wrote:
I guess you will have to resort to using
hw.isci.force_legacy_interrupts=1 until I get around to implement MSI-X
support for Xen Dom0, sorry for the trouble.
No worries, that's a fine workaround.
Thanks for all the help!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154428
Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135178
--- Comment #5 from Roger Pau Monné roy...@freebsd.org ---
This bug is not about TSO + PF, just about TSO, which seems to work fine now
(when not used in conjunction with PF).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135178
Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
