Re: XENHVM ada - ad ?

2012-12-21 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 01:31 +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Hi, I have the feeling I'm missing something very basic here: I have a 9-STABLE-amd64 (as of a few minutes ago, but I see the same thing with older versions) running as guest on Xen HVM (APIC, ACPI on). I can boot the GENERIC

Re: XENHVM ada - ad ?

2012-12-21 Thread Mark Felder
On this topic, is there any way to *definitively* know which Xen block device corresponds to which adaX device? The guys at Citrix really want to know instead of just assuming that xbd.0 is ada0. Perhaps adding a sysctl value like dev.xbd.0.%block: /dev/ada0 would be nice... Who would I talk to

Re: XENHVM ada - ad ?

2012-12-20 Thread Mike Kaganski
On 12/21/2012 10:31 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Do I need to translate from 'ada' back to 'ad' if I use XENHVM? Why? Yes, because the FreeBSD's XEN ata driver has not been moved to new naming scheme yet. -- Best regards, Mike Kaganski ___