On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it possible that there's a bug
in how our blkfront negotiates the request ring? Does anyone have
ring_pages 1 in use?
The only backend driver I know of that can
On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it possible that there's a bug
in how our blkfront negotiates the request ring? Does anyone have
ring_pages 1 in use?
The
[oops, let's try sending this again with reply-all instead of reply...]
On 07/05/11 19:04, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it possible
On 07/05/11 19:42, Colin Percival wrote:
On 07/05/11 19:04, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Maybe the right option is to have a loader tunable dev.xn.linuxback to
control which version of the protocol is used?
What a mess.
Yep. Mess or not, shall I go
