https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #24 from Roger Pau Monné ---
Hello,
Maybe the dhclient fix is more appropriate?
I'm quite lost, so I would recommend that you create a differential review with
what you consider better and add hrs, adrian
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #23 from Bhavesh Davda ---
Hi Roger, it's been quite some time since that last update and am wondering if
this slipped through the cracks. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #22 from Roger Pau Monné ---
(In reply to Bhavesh Davda from comment #20)
In this case I would prefer so. I don't know much about net, much less about
dhclient, so I would like someone that knows to review
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #21 from Bhavesh Davda ---
(In reply to Alexander Nusov from comment #19)
Hi Alexander, IMHO just like the referenced bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910619#c6 in that openstack nova
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
Alexander Nusov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #18 from Roger Pau Monné ---
(In reply to Bhavesh Davda from comment #16)
Sadly dhclient is not my area of expertise, so we will have to wait for someone
to review it. I've created a differential revision
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #16 from Bhavesh Davda ---
(In reply to Roger Pau Monné from comment #15)
Yes, your comment #15 convinces me that returning only CSUM_DATA_VALID and
CSUM_PSEUDO_HDR with csum_data set to 0x is the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #15 from Roger Pau Monné ---
(In reply to Bhavesh Davda from comment #14)
And the mbuf(9) man page says:
"If a particular network interface just indicates success or failure of TCP or
UDP checksum
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #14 from Bhavesh Davda ---
(In reply to Roger Pau Monné from comment #8)
I looked at the proposed patch to the netfront driver, and think this
introduces a semantic mismatch between the meaning of the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #13 from Roger Pau Monné ---
(In reply to Bhavesh Davda from comment #12)
IMHO, then the correct fix is to accept 0x as a valid checksum (which is
the value set by netfront and other drivers when the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #12 from Bhavesh Davda ---
(In reply to Roger Pau Monné from comment #8)
Yes, I know this change to dhclient seems unfortunately 'hackish' but is
necessary because dhcilent relies on an interface
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #11 from Bhavesh Davda ---
(In reply to Roger Pau Monné from comment #9)
Yes, in a FreeBSD 11.0 VM, I had already verified this workaround works:
in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_XN0="DHCP -rxcsum"
Note
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
Roger Pau Monné changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #180307|0 |1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #9 from Roger Pau Monné ---
(In reply to Bhavesh Davda from comment #7)
Can you try to disable txcsum and rxcsum inside of the guest and see if that
solves the issue? (this will only work on FreeBSD 11.0).
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
Roger Pau Monné changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
--- Comment #7 from Bhavesh Davda ---
I'm hitting the same issue, as are other colleagues who have tried various
versions of FreeBSD from 8.4 to 10.0 to 11.0 as a domU guest on Xen.
The issue has to do with
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188990
Bhavesh Davda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
17 matches
Mail list logo