Ahh... Thanks for the answer. I guess we will keep the
performance-bound FreeBSD servers standalone then.
Rgds,
On 2010-06-19, Guillaume Seigneuret g...@omegacube.fr wrote:
As far as I could try, FreeBSD 8 paravitualized is not suitable for
production use.
It crashes under stress.
Cordialement,
Guillaume Seigneuret
Network and System Security Architect
Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
Address :
Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
Technopôle de Château Gombert
13382 Marseille Cedex 13
-Message d'origine-
De : owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] De
la part de Pandu Poluan
Envoyé : samedi 19 juin 2010 07:53
À : freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Objet : Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
Hello all,
I'm just trying to confirm: Is it true that FreeBSD 8's support for
Paravirtualized Guest on XenServer still experimental/beta?
Because we need to make sure that FreeBSD-based *production* servers
can be paravirtualized on the xenserver hosts -- performance reasons.
That said, I've tried installing FreeBSD 8 in HVM mode, seems to work
okay -- might be suitable for the 1 or 2 servers that does not need
highest performance.
PS: I'm not really familiar with FreeBSD, though I am familiar with
Linux. Some hand-holding will be appreciated :-)
Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
___
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Sent from my mobile device
--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
___
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
