On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:15 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 10/07/13 17:54, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Just got a rootbsd.net instance and the 9.1r XENHVM that they provided
> > me works great.
> >
> > Attempted to boot -current on their systems and the XENHVM kernel
> > panic'd when it could find a
On 10/07/13 18:41, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:15 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 10/07/13 17:54, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>> Just got a rootbsd.net instance and the 9.1r XENHVM that they provided
>>> me works great.
>>>
>>> Attempted to boot -current on their systems and the XENHVM
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 18:15 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 10/07/13 17:54, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Just got a rootbsd.net instance and the 9.1r XENHVM that they provided
> > me works great.
> >
> > Attempted to boot -current on their systems and the XENHVM kernel
> > panic'd when it could find a
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 10/07/13 17:54, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Just got a rootbsd.net instance and the 9.1r XENHVM that they provided
> > me works great.
> >
> > Attempted to boot -current on their systems and the XENHVM kernel
> > panic'd when it could find an
On 10/07/13 17:54, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Just got a rootbsd.net instance and the 9.1r XENHVM that they provided
> me works great.
>
> Attempted to boot -current on their systems and the XENHVM kernel
> panic'd when it could find any hardware timers. This is a pretty
> serious regression that I'll b
Just got a rootbsd.net instance and the 9.1r XENHVM that they provided
me works great.
Attempted to boot -current on their systems and the XENHVM kernel
panic'd when it could find any hardware timers. This is a pretty
serious regression that I'll bisect this weekend if nobody is looking at
it.
F
