[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start ("bind failed: The operation completed successfully")

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Status:None => Duplicate Assigned to:None => cazfi Open/Closed:Open => Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start ("bind failed: The operation completed successfully")

Follow-up Comment #30, bug #22448 (project freeciv): One suspect for root cause is bug #24267 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Gna!

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start ("bind failed: The operation completed successfully")

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Planned Release: 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 => 2.5.x, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Planned Release: 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 = 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22448 ___ Message sent

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #29, bug #22448 (project freeciv): From new bug #23592: 0: bind failed: The system detected an invalid pointer address in attempting to use a pointer argument in a call. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #28, bug #22448 (project freeciv): Waiting for more reports if the sockaddr size fix helped. 2.5.0 has been out 1.5 months and there has been no reports about this bug. Assuming fixed and closing if there's no reports before 2.5.1 gets released.

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = None Planned Release: 2.5.0, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 = 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #27: Waiting for more

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test Planned Release:2.5.0, 2.6.0 = 2.5.0, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #23: Completely

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #22, bug #22448 (project freeciv): Patch to pass sizeof fc_sockaddr union (i.e. size of biggest member) instead of specific member on Windows builds (I really don't want to mess the other systems by replacing what looks like more correct thing to do with something that windows

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #21, bug #22448 (project freeciv): 0: bind failed: The system detected an invalid pointer address in attempting to use a pointer argument in a call. is really common on my machine. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms740668%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Planned Release: = 2.5.0, 2.6.0 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22448 ___ Message sent

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #22448 (project freeciv): We're getting similar reports against 2.4.3. I've raised them as a separate ticket, bug #22549, as 2.4 and 2.5 socket setup is different; but the root cause may turn out to be the same.

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #22448 (project freeciv): If this starts to look 2.5-specific, my guess is that the fix for bug #21583 (removal of SO_REUSEADDR) exposed it. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22448

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Category:None = general ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Opened bug #22481 about how error message claims that The operation completed successfully. Once

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22448 (project freeciv): Is this when you're starting server again very soon after it had been closed (crashed?). The error message indicates that the network port freeciv uses is being held by some other process (I assume previous freeciv server process here). Recently

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22448] Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)

Update of bug #22448 (project freeciv): Severity: 3 - Normal = 4 - Important Summary: Freeciv server fails to start = Freeciv server fails to start (bind failed: The operation completed successfully)