Update of patch #2353 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #2353 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?2353
___
Message sent
Update of patch #2353 (project freeciv):
Status:None = In Progress
Assigned to:None = mixcoatl
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #2353 (project freeciv):
I know little about early Slavic history, so I'll leave it up to you guys if
we want to include the Vistulans or not.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?2353
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #2353 (project freeciv):
I still think that this is a valid nation, but I'm not planning to die for it
;) If Andrzej thinks that there is a good reason for not including it, I won't
mind (even without the Vistulans there are lots of nations in Freeciv).
Follow-up Comment #5, patch #2353 (project freeciv):
Despite some uncertainty, I agree for this nation. Vistulans are popularized
in Polish historiography. State of Vistulans is often served as one of the two
centers of development of Polish statehood.
Sometimes for Małopolska appears also the
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?2353
Summary: Vistulan nation
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: hubkow
Submitted on: Sat 15 Jan 2011 10:59:49 AM GMT
Category: rulesets
Priority: 5 - Normal
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #2353 (project freeciv):
The existence of this tribe is rather hypothetical and very poorly attested
in the sources. More is known about Lendians.
Wysz was lendian leader and his name used in lendian ruleset.
Dobromir was more unknown ruler, we do not know which
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #2353 (project freeciv):
Point taken, since Wysz clashes with the Lendian ruleset, I removed it from
the Vistulan.
Little is known about Vistulans, yet they are mentioned in some sources and
they are included in most historical references (including school primers,
