[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4889] Pathfinding refactoring

2014-07-09 Thread pepeto
Update of patch #4889 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4889] Pathfinding refactoring

2014-07-06 Thread pepeto
Update of patch #4889 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = In Progress ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4889 ___ Message posté

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4889] Pathfinding refactoring

2014-07-06 Thread pepeto
Update of patch #4889 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #2: New version: * clarify the usage of paranthesizes in pf_get_action() ; * split 'enum pf_action'

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4889] Pathfinding refactoring

2014-07-02 Thread pepeto
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?4889 Summary: Pathfinding refactoring Project: Freeciv Submitted by: pepeto Submitted on: mer. 02 juil. 2014 15:24:47 CEST Category: ai Priority: 5 - Normal

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4889] Pathfinding refactoring

2014-07-02 Thread Emmet Hikory
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4889 (project freeciv): In pf_get_action(), could parentheses be added to the assignment of non_allied_city_tile? I found it surprising to read (also, when assigning as the first call in a function, I prefer assigning in declaration, but not doing that isn't