[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

Update of patch #7731 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

Follow-up Comment #5, patch #7731 (project freeciv): > Is this intentional? If yes: why? Were I a teacher, I would say I was testing your reviewing capabilities... Since I'm not, let me say I'm impressed by them. > Maybe mention what value of darkness_layer makes the defaults handle it? *darkness

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

Update of patch #7731 (project freeciv): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => sveinung Contains string changes:None => No _

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

Follow-up Comment #3, patch #7731 (project freeciv): Ready Set Nitpick ! Proposed wording for Wikia: *darkness_layer* was merged into the new *layer_order* tag. See the bundled tilesets for how to use it. (file #28926) ___ Additional Item

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

Follow-up Comment #2, patch #7731 (project freeciv): > Is backwards compatibility needed/preferred ? I don't think it is. Just document it in the wiki's 2.6 to 3.0 tileset upgrade guide. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #7731 (project freeciv): I think the most consistent way is to go for a standard layer. In the end, darkness_layer is a hack to allow for some customization of the drawing order. layer_order is more flexible and scales better. Is backwards compatibility needed/preferre

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7731] Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order

URL: Summary: Tilespec: darkness_layer vs layer_order Project: Freeciv Submitted by: sveinung Submitted on: Mon 26 Sep 2016 09:53:34 AM UTC Category: client Priority: 5 - Normal