[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3870] New base to base_owner(), not tile_owner()

Follow-up Comment #2, patch #3870 (project freeciv): Yes, though the main reason I'm working on this area is to provide ownership for bases even if terrain is not owned at all. See bug #16385 for example (there's other related tickets) ___

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3871] Control airlift nativity with EFT_AIRLIFT

URL: Summary: Control airlift nativity with EFT_AIRLIFT Project: Freeciv Submitted by: persia Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 03:10:53 PM JST Category: general Priority: 5 - Norma

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3870] New base to base_owner(), not tile_owner()

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #3870 (project freeciv): Do I read this correctly as providing a framework for a future feature allowing one player to own a base in another player's territory? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3870] New base to base_owner(), not tile_owner()

URL: Summary: New base to base_owner(), not tile_owner() Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 03:45:01 AM EEST Category: general Priority: 5 - Norm

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3869] Place partisans based on nativity

URL: Summary: Place partisans based on nativity Project: Freeciv Submitted by: persia Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 09:28:49 AM JST Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3868] Refactor unleash_barbarians() terrain analysis loop

URL: Summary: Refactor unleash_barbarians() terrain analysis loop Project: Freeciv Submitted by: persia Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 09:27:29 AM JST Category: general Priority:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3867] Drop map_move_cost_ai()

URL: Summary: Drop map_move_cost_ai() Project: Freeciv Submitted by: persia Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 09:26:18 AM JST Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3866] Drop is_cardinally_adj_to_ocean()

URL: Summary: Drop is_cardinally_adj_to_ocean() Project: Freeciv Submitted by: persia Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 09:25:14 AM JST Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3865] Drop tile_clear_unsupported_infrastructure()

URL: Summary: Drop tile_clear_unsupported_infrastructure() Project: Freeciv Submitted by: persia Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 09:23:55 AM JST Category: general Priority: 5 - No

[Freeciv-Dev] [task #7668] Tracking release 2.5.0

Update of task #7668 (project freeciv): Depends on: => patch #3864 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3864] Update scenario files format to 2.5 format

URL: Summary: Update scenario files format to 2.5 format Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 02:42:07 AM EEST Category: rulesets Priority: 5 - Nor

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3350] Add Alien World files to POTFILES

Update of patch #3350 (project freeciv): Category:None => general Status:None => Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #3: - Updated against

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #19846] Closing unit select dialog asserts or crashes

Update of bug #19846 (project freeciv): Summary: Closing unit select dialog asserts => Closing unit select dialog asserts or crashes ___ Reply to this item at: _

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3651] Setting TRUNK for 2.6 development

Update of patch #3651 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => Ready For Test Assigned to:None => cazfi ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3652] First commit to S2_5

Update of patch #3652 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => Ready For Test Assigned to:None => cazfi ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3863] Document gtk3-client unit selection dialog crash

URL: Summary: Document gtk3-client unit selection dialog crash Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Mon 22 Apr 2013 01:09:38 AM EEST Category: docs Priority: 5 - N

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3829] Allow compatible roads

Update of patch #3829 (project freeciv): Status:None => Ready For Test Assigned to:None => cazfi Planned Release: => 2.5.0

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20753] "is_available" in nation rulesets does nothing

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #20753 (project freeciv): btw. Is it possible to have nation that one cannot select in the beginning, but which still can appear through civil war during the game? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20744] Recursive wipe_unit() saving drowning units from calling wipe_unit()

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #20744 (project freeciv): I think it's safe either way: I just tend to avoid having unused arguments or functions if possible, to ease later reading of the code (but given the volume of testing to which this was subjected, there is a strong argument for leaving it intact)

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3721] Getting rid of move_type dependency on unitselect dialog

Follow-up Comment #2, patch #3721 (project freeciv): I don't think it is safe to use !can_exist_at_tile() as the filter if we're looking to exclude transported units: that implies an assertion that at any time the client is sufficiently idle to take a new command, no untransported unit cannot

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3851] Remove extra files from gui-gtk-3.0 theme directory

Update of patch #3851 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Assigned to:None => cazfi Open/Closed:Open => Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3842] Ensure use of boolean TRUE/FALSE in reqs specifications

Update of patch #3842 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3852] Lua 5.2.2

Update of patch #3852 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Assigned to:None => cazfi Open/Closed:Open => Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20744] Recursive wipe_unit() saving drowning units from calling wipe_unit()

Update of bug #20744 (project freeciv): Planned Release: 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.6.0 => 2.4.0-beta2, 2.5.0, 2.6.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #4: Correction: Had to make new version anyway due to other changes to codebase, so removed S2_4 h

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20744] Recursive wipe_unit() saving drowning units from calling wipe_unit()

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #20744 (project freeciv): As we're heading to beta2, I'll commit this with extra argument intact. That's what's been extensively tested (like in: several autogames (on multicore system) constantly running almost from the day trunk patch was first introduced). We may clean

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20753] "is_available" in nation rulesets does nothing

Update of bug #20753 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-nations-is_available.patch Size:0 KB __

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3860] Nations ruleset: allow terrain checking against explicit compatibility list

Additional Item Attachment, patch #3860 (project freeciv): File name: trunk-nations-allowed-terrains-bis.patch Size:11 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3859] Nations ruleset: move government compatibility checking to nationlist.ruleset

Additional Item Attachment, patch #3859 (project freeciv): File name: trunk-nations-allowed-govs-ter.patch Size:10 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sen

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20753] "is_available" in nation rulesets does nothing

URL: Summary: "is_available" in nation rulesets does nothing Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sun Apr 21 15:36:45 2013 Category: None Severity: 2 - Minor

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Nativity restrictions in clients

Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 21 April 2013 00:21, Emmet Hikory wrote: > > unitselect_common.c:usdlg_check_unit_location() > > patch #3721? Yes, precisely. Thank you. -- Emmet HIKORY ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.g

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3448] "Nation sets": allow set of nations that will ever appear in-game to be chosen

Update of patch #3448 (project freeciv): Status: Need Info => In Progress Assigned to:None => jtn ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20751] assertion 'normal_player_count() <= game.server.max_players' failed

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #20751 (project freeciv): It seams to correct the issue. At least, it doesn't assert. Thanks ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message s

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Nativity restrictions in clients

On 21 April 2013 00:21, Emmet Hikory wrote: > The client code seems to use UMT_*, TC_OCEAN, is_foo_unit(), and > is_ocean() in several places for which I don't really understand the > correct behaviour to support complex unit nativity. Suggestions, > opinions, and pointers to open bugs or pa

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20751] assertion 'normal_player_count() <= game.server.max_players' failed

Update of bug #20751 (project freeciv): Planned Release: 2.3.5, 2.4.0, 2.5.0 => 2.3.5, 2.4.0-beta2, 2.5.0 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message se