Update of bug #21416 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4436 (project freeciv):
New S2_5 version that updates README.packaging,
(file #19810)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: CliModpack-S2_5.patch Size:14 KB
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21523
Summary: Path finding assertion 0 maybe_length fails
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Tue 21 Jan 2014 07:33:50 PM EET
Category: None
Severity: 5 - Blocker
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #19589 (project freeciv):
I have tested the patch over S2_5 and it seems to work as expected.
I noticed only one minor problem: when a new city is built or destroyed, the
tech upkeep value showed in the research window is not updated until the end
of turn.
Thank you
Update of patch #3903 (project freeciv):
Status:None = In Progress
Planned Release: = 2.6.0
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
How could I get the
Update of bug #21506 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of patch #4430 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of patch #4446 (project freeciv):
Category:None = bootstrap
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4446
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21523 (project freeciv):
Attached autogame fails the assert at turn 308.
S2_4 r24186
This uses multiplayer ruleset. None of the assert failures has happened with
classic/experimental/civ1/civ2 rulesets, but mostly with custom rulesets;
ancients and default3.
(file
Update of bug #21523 (project freeciv):
Assigned to:None = pepeto
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21523
___
Message posté
Update of bug #21523 (project freeciv):
Category:None = general
Status:None = Confirmed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
I can reproduce from
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #21523 (project freeciv):
I can reproduce from start, but not from savegame
That's usual with autogames. The game state does not completely survive
save+load (I filed that something like bug #423 on RT well over a decade ago
;-)
Update of bug #19589 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #21523 (project freeciv):
Where could I find one of your custom ruleset to speed up the diagnostic of
the bug?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21523
Update of bug #21126 (project freeciv):
Category:None = general
Status:None = Ready For Test
Planned Release: = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21444 (project freeciv):
Another weirdness in secfile saving noticed when updating tileset-demo.sav
scenario on S2_5. Why it wants to have love column in separate table:
-ai={love,spam,countdown,war_reason,patience,warn_space,ask_peace
,ask_alliance,ask_ceasefire
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #21523 (project freeciv):
Where could I find one of your custom ruleset to speed up the
diagnostic of the bug?
Easiest way to get Ancients is to run freeciv-modpack with my alternative
modpack list:
modinst/freeciv-modpack -L
Follow-up Comment #1, task #7669 (project freeciv):
I earlier suggested changing freeciv version number to 2.5.0-beta as part of
task #7670 - network protocol freeze.
Actually it should take place in datafile format freeze already - savegames
have the version number of the server where they have
Follow-up Comment #3, task #7670 (project freeciv):
Patch for freezing network capstr, and changing version from 2.5.0-alpha (set
datafile format freeze time) to 2.5.0-beta.
(file #19817)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name:
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21524
Summary: Failing asserts from player removal when quitting
scenario in pregame.
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wed 22 Jan 2014 12:40:35 AM EET
Category: None
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21524 (project freeciv):
Bletch, presumably associated with my fix for bug #21384. As such, might also
affect S2_4?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21524
Update of bug #21524 (project freeciv):
Planned Release: = 2.4.2,2.5.0,2.6.0
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
[...] might also affect S2_4?
Yes.
___
Update of bug #21516 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #21516 (project freeciv):
Summary: fileinfoname_required() is cruft? =
fileinfoname_required() is cruft
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21516
Update of patch #4442 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #21517 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4443 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #21523 (project freeciv):
I failed to reproduce with ancients and default3 rulesets. My only way to
reproduce is to run the 308 turns of the attached script...
Could someone post a savegame the assertion is reproducible?
We've had a couple of important bug fixes recently, which means it's
about time for a new stable release, 2.4.2. I don't have a date yet, but
it should be soonish.
At the same time, I'm minded to do the oldstable 2.3.5 release we've
talked about, and then finally close the S2_3 branch.
The
Update of patch #4446 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4437 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #21495 (project freeciv):
Planned Release: 2.4.2, 2.5.0, 2.6.0 = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21495
___
Message sent
Update of bug #21496 (project freeciv):
Planned Release: 2.4.2, 2.5.0, 2.6.0 = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?21496
___
Message sent
33 matches
Mail list logo
