Update of patch #4853 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4852 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4854 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4855 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4856 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4858 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4857 (project freeciv):
The civil war chunks seem out of place here, but useful anyway: no reason for
a new patch, but if they belong somewhere else, maybe adjust?
___
Reply to this item at:
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4861
Summary: Allow Ferryboat as a starting unit
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 06:45:33 PM JST
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4862
Summary: Use common ferry function for settler ferry check
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 06:47:58 PM JST
Category: ai
Priority: 5 -
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4863
Summary: Validate boats are sea capable by terrain iteration
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 06:52:27 PM JST
Category: general
Priority:
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4864
Summary: Distance-based calculation for meeting charges
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 07:01:38 PM JST
Category: ai
Priority: 5 - Normal
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4865
Summary: Consolidate move_type usage and move more usage to
client
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 07:09:53 PM JST
Category: general
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4866
Summary: Provide alternate semantics to the client to replace
move_type
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 07:18:56 PM JST
Category: client
Follow-up Comment #6, patch #3721 (project freeciv):
One of the patches in patch #4866 provides a new ruleset field (unit class
group) that could be used for this purpose, if there is interest in that sort
of solution (as hinted at the end of the original submission).
Update of patch #4866 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #4865
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4866
___
Message sent
Update of patch #4865 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #4861
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4865
___
Message sent
Update of patch #4865 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #4863
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4865
___
Message sent
Update of patch #4865 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #4864
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4865
___
Message sent
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4867
Summary: Quickselect should not depend on move_type
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 07:59:59 PM JST
Category: client
Priority: 5 - Normal
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4868
Summary: Don't use move_type to set colors in Qt client city
production painting
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 08:04:01 PM JST
Category: client-qt
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4869
Summary: Remove move_type from the client
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 08:16:38 PM JST
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
Update of patch #4869 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #3721
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4869
___
Message sent
Update of patch #4869 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #4866
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4869
___
Message sent
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22241
Summary: Nation help uses rule name, not translated name
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 12:41:27 BST
Category: client
Severity: 3 - Normal
Update of task #7808 (project freeciv):
Should be Finished on: Mon 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 BST = Sat 28 Jun 2014
00:00:00 BST
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Percent Complete: 80% = 100%
Update of bug #22241 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: trunk-S2_5-help-nation-translation.patch Size:4 KB
File name:
Update of patch #4822 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of patch #4821 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #4852 (project freeciv):
In S2_5, Airbase became a userflag.
(Actually this was in 2009; patch #1205.)
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4852
___
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #4852 (project freeciv):
Do you think it's worth pushing this to S2_4 as well?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4852
___
Message sent via/by Gna!
Follow-up Comment #11, patch #4830 (project freeciv):
Patch version, which adds multipliers to help dialog.
Setting two variables in ruleset_free(game.c) to zero is needed for cleanup
purposes. If we don't do that, then in special cases (for example ruleset was
loaded many times) we can't load
Update of patch #1341 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Ready For Test
Assigned to:None = persia
Planned Release: = 2.6.0
Summary:
Follow-up Comment #12, patch #4830 (project freeciv):
On the global variables: I agree they are needed for cleanup purposes, but I
still think they should be scoped to multipliers.c. Consider adding helper
functions to game_ruleset_init() and game_ruleset_free() that operate on
static variables
Update of patch #4789 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Ready For Test
Assigned to:None = jtn
Planned Release: = 2.6.0
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #4857 (project freeciv):
The AI callback API change was already in separate patch. Do you want also the
tech_want copying from player to player to be moved from server/plrhand.c to
new callback in separate patch before this (and then just adjusted with this
patch)?
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22243
Summary: City with more than max trade routes can't change
them
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 22:16:11 BST
Category: None
Severity: 2 -
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22244
Summary: Illegal trade route Active setting
counterintuitive
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sat 28 Jun 2014 22:32:08 BST
Category: docs
Severity: 3 -
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22244 (project freeciv):
(this being the setting added in patch #3611)
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22244
___
Message sent via/by Gna!
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22243 (project freeciv):
Also, can_establish_trade_route() checks for ==max, so currently gives the
wrong answer in the face of excess routes. It should be updated for whatever
the conclusion of this is.
(establish_trade_route() also checks ==max, but in that case
Update of bug #22236 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #1341 (project freeciv):
Does this cause behavior changes?
What happens in these situations:
1) You learn Gunpowder, but haven't built any Barracks II yet (all existing
Barracks should be sold)
2) You conquer city with Barracks II, but don't know Gunpowder yourself,
Update of bug #22188 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #4857 (project freeciv):
No, I just didn't understand why cai_created_by_civil_war() and
twai_created_by_civil_war() were being defined in a patch that otherwise looks
like a data storage migration patch, having not thought it through
sufficiently to realise this copy
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #4857 (project freeciv):
- Updated against svn
(file #21189)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: AiTechWant-2.patch.bz2 Size:7 KB
___
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?4870
Summary: Clearer error message when no client can be built
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Sun 29 Jun 2014 02:58:34 AM EEST
Category: bootstrap
Priority:
Update of patch #4870 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
Planned Release: = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name:
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #1341 (project freeciv):
I'll test these conditions to verify, but from code interpretation:
1) Because, unlike other requirements vectors, obsolete_by is disjunctive,
Barracks is interpreted as obsolete by improvement_obsolete(), so handled
appropriately. Thinking
Follow-up Comment #5, patch #1341 (project freeciv):
1) is now tested, and indeed works as expected: learning Gunpowder causes one
to sell all Barracks, even if one has not built any Barracks II
2) Is also tested: attempts to force worklist inclusion of the obsolete
Barracks I in a city
48 matches
Mail list logo
