URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
Michael Kaufman wrote:
sorry, yes inventions are technically trinary, but for purposes of passing
to the client, they're binary, since update_research() is called upon
receiving a player_info packet.
Wow, is that wrong! I'll delete
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
Michael Kaufman wrote:
sorry, yes inventions are technically trinary, but for purposes of passing
to the client, they're binary, since update_research() is called upon
receiving a player_info packet.
Wow, is that wrong! I'll
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
On 13/08/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just testing my recent patch with an old savegame, and F6 doesn't display
any advances. Since I'm at Republic, that's not correct
Reproducible without that patch? Can
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
The problem was in some assumptions of the patch. Believing my own lying
eyes, the code seemed to pass a string in the packet handler that was
(nearly) identical to the savegame.
Unfortunately, there turned out to be intervening
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:10:57PM -0700, William Allen Simpson wrote:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
The problem was in some assumptions of the patch. Believing my own lying
eyes, the code seemed to
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39558
Marko Lindqvist wrote:
Make sure to update capability string in same commit as you change
packet definitions.
What a fine idea. That's documented where, exactly?
___
Freeciv-dev
