[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2010-10-30 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #14515 (project freeciv): (This would be easier to express in the ruleset if the effects system could combine numbers in more ways than just addition, such as min() and max(). But that's probably a separate bug.) Perhaps an additional field could be added to the

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2010-10-30 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #14515 (project freeciv): perhaps an additional 'priority' flag could be used? On ruleset load there must be a check that for each effect no priority is duplicated. Furthermore, the effects must be saved in the corresponding order.

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-28 Thread pepeto
Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Fixed Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-26 Thread pepeto
Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Fixed Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-26 Thread Jacob Nevins
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #14515 (project freeciv): Sorry to comment on a closed bug, but there are a couple of loose ends on this subject: Firstly, the docs for S2_1 need the same fix as S2_2/trunk (but the behaviour is fine). I've attached a patch for that. Secondly, the same priority

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-26 Thread pepeto
Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status: Fixed = In Progress Open/Closed: Closed = Open ___ Follow-up Comment #7: Reopening this

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-26 Thread Jacob Nevins
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #14515 (project freeciv): We cannot change S2_1 documentation because it would require translation jobs. Boo. Well, I've updated the wiki http://freeciv.wikia.com/index.php?title=Buildings_catalogcurid=1764diff=15079oldid=14601. Me neither, but I think you are

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-25 Thread pepeto
Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Your patch looks to fix all the issues. However, I'm uncertain about the

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-23 Thread Jacob Nevins
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #14515 (project freeciv): cazfi writes: Yes, it's deliberate rule change. OK, thanks. I'm assuming the principle that you should always get the single best pollution bonus from all your buildings you have, since no-one's objected. So, here's a second version of my

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-22 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14515 (project freeciv): This is particularly obvious with Solar Plant -- if you only have a Factory, pollution is only reduced to half, not eliminated. Is this deliberate? If so, the documentation needs patching; if not, the ruleset. Yes, it's deliberate rule

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-21 Thread pepeto
Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Assigned to:None = pepeto ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14515 ___ Message posté

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

2009-10-13 Thread Jacob Nevins
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?14515 Summary: Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Wednesday 14/10/09 at 00:02 Category: rulesets