Update of patch #3815 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #11, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
S2_4 version
(file #17837)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: StaticOceanMoveHelp-S2_4.patch Size:2 KB
___
Reply to
Follow-up Comment #9, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
Old description is redundant, but is it still something that
makes people to realize the difference between Ocean and Deep
Ocean while they are less likely to spot that unit class lists
differ?
I agree. I think it's worth keeping the
Follow-up Comment #10, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
While we have no formal string freeze for beta2, I'd leave out patch that
*only* changes texts (i.e, is not doing it as part of larger bugfix) now that
we have 100% translations.
___
Follow-up Comment #5, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
The attached files provide one possible adjustment to the static helptexts for
S2_4 and trunk. In trunk, I did not remove the phrases Planet's radiation
makes it impossible for Earthly organisms to survive here., Burrowing units
are unable to
Follow-up Comment #8, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
I committed the helptext generation part, but would really like more opinions
of the changes to static texts. Old description is redundant, but is it still
something that makes people to realize the difference between Ocean and Deep
Ocean while
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
- S2_4 version that compiles
We may want to change static helptexts for some terrains too. Now Ocean
helptext redundantly mentions that it can be traveled by sea and trireme
units, and deep ocean points out that trireme cannot travel there.
Update of patch #3815 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Ready For Test
Assigned to:None = cazfi
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Usually jtn has had
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
I didn't mean to rush processing of this patch with the comment in patch #3816
, rather I just wanted to provide a hint for testing, as when I checked the
submitted patch against revision 22638 it didn't apply cleanly. Anyway, I
believe that
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #3815 (project freeciv):
Seems like a fine change to me.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?3815
___
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
Emmet Hikory writes:
I was unable to build S2_4 from revision 22639 due to a LUA error
(which I presume related to some local configuration on my machine),
so this is entirely theoretical, rather than a tested patch.
What's the nature of the failure?
If we're releasing 2.4.0-beta2 soon, I'm
Mon, Apr 01, 2013, Jacob Nevins wrote:
What's the nature of the failure?
If we're releasing 2.4.0-beta2 soon, I'm interested in portability
hazards
(Guess: are you switching a single working directory between trunk
and S2_4? This is currently fraught, requiring make maintainer-clean and
Update of patch #3815 (project freeciv):
Planned Release: = 2.4.0, 2.5.0
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?3815
___
Message sent
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?3815
Summary: Provide information about unit class nativity in
terrain help
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 30 Mar 2013 03:46:16 PM GMT
Category: client
14 matches
Mail list logo
