On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:15:47 +0900, Jason Dorje Short [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many distributions are still not released version (of the
distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both
Is somebody able to fix the 2.0.9 crashes reported in #39472 and
#39582? I can still reproduce the crashes with current S2_0. Another
reported 2.0 problem is #39757, which has a patch that hasn't been
committed yet.
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:05:19 +0900, Christian Prochaska
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is somebody able to fix the 2.0.9 crashes reported in #39472 and
#39582? I can still reproduce the crashes with current S2_0. Another
reported 2.0 problem is #39757, which has a patch that hasn't been
committed
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:05:19 +0900, Christian Prochaska
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is somebody able to fix the 2.0.9 crashes reported in #39472 and
#39582? I can still reproduce the crashes with current S2_0. Another
reported 2.0 problem is #39757, which has a patch
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many distributions are still not released version (of the
distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both
supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to
be sometimes more
On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many distributions are still not released version (of the
distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both
supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to
be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's
Many distributions are still not released version (of the
distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both
supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to
be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's over year since 2.0.9 was
released and many crasher bugs
