[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39628) 'Take this player' should not be sensitive when cannot take

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39628 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mar. Aoû. 28 22:02:13 2007]: gtk-client: 'Take this player' and 'Observe this player' are sensitive even if current allowtake setting makes those actions impossible. 'Toggle player ready' seems to be

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#18641) [Bug] Cannot unload aircraft from carrier

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18641 On 29/08/2007, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the end, I don't see what good the 'Unload' command would do even if it worked and suggest we just get rid of it. It was added so that player could arrange what unit goes

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39545) [Patch] Up to date freeciv.spec.in

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39545 On 29/08/2007, Egor Vyscrebentsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PS. It seems to me that we may move away from alternatives, assuming that civclient is always gui-gtk-2.0 client. However, I had some thoughts about making civclient a

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39502) Readline memory leaks

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39502 On 07/08/2007, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Valgrind reports several memory blocks allocated by readline not freed. ... Even if it turns out to be readline problem, this ticket should be used to create valgrind

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39629) Freeciv SDl/Client Win2000

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39629 I had the following bug while try to attack a city with a military unit : Assertion failed ! Program: civclient.exe File: goto.c Line: 862 Expression: unit_is_in_focus(punit) Nicolas CHAMPSAVOIR CNES - DCT/PS/SSC Tel: (05.61.2)

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39562) [Patch] Improved choice asserts

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39562 On 14/08/2007, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In current trunk bad choice structures cause illegal memory access (old iterators were more robust, but at the same time they hide bugs). This patch makes easier to hunt those

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39629) Freeciv SDl/Client Win2000

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39629 On 8/29/07, Champsavoir Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39629 I had the following bug while try to attack a city with a military unit : Assertion failed ! Program:

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39631) Typos in tutorial

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39631 This transaction appears to have no content I have found a few typos in the tutorial.sav file. They are corrected in the diff file. And one question: in line 180, talking about big cities, where it says: Make sure you have enough taxes

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39630) Typos in several nation rulesets

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39630 This transaction appears to have no content Several typos I have found in the ottoman, colombian, westphalian, malian, byzantium, and romanian rulesets while translating. See file for the details. Cheers, Joan Several typos I have

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39631) Typos in tutorial

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39631 On 8/30/07, Joan Creus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39631 This transaction appears to have no content I have found a few typos in the tutorial.sav file. They are corrected in the

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39631) Typos in tutorial

URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39631 On 8/30/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also in byzantium.ruleset: the Byzanines controlled nearly all of Middle East should be the Byzantines controlled nearly all of the Middle East ~Daniel Whoops. This