Update of patch #1823 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of patch #1830 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?1842
Summary: Take advantage of Content-Length header
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wednesday 08/11/2010 at 11:08
Category: module installer
Priority: 5 -
Update of patch #1842 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #1841
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1842
___
Message sent
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?1843
Summary: Check http return status
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wednesday 08/11/2010 at 11:29
Category: module installer
Priority: 5 - Normal
Update of patch #1843 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #1842
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1843
___
Message sent
Update of bug #16396 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #16346 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16404
Summary: civ start script doesn't work
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: pepeto
Submitted on: mercredi 11.08.2010 à 09:18
Category: bootstrap
Severity: 3 - Normal
Update of bug #16339 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #16264 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #16063 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
On 10 August 2010 20:46, Egor Vyscrebentsov evy...@gmail.com wrote:
Good day!
Are there any thoughts on to support or not to support XDG Base
Directory Specification[1]?
I agree with the idea that one program (Freeciv is considered one
program even though it has technically separate server
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?1844
Summary: Add utilities to consider the cost of a requirement
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: pepeto
Submitted on: mercredi 11.08.2010 à 12:11
Category: ai
Priority: 5 -
Update of patch #1338 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #1844
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1338
___
Message
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?1845
Summary: libcurl
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wednesday 08/11/2010 at 15:20
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: In
Update of bug #16404 (project freeciv):
Category: bootstrap = general
Assigned to:None = cazfi
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
What, and where
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16404 (project freeciv):
Hm, sorry, I add an extra freeciv/ directory in my repository work copy,
removing it fixed the problem. But why it tries to execute this command?
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #1845 (project freeciv):
Do this allow to do asynchronous DNS lookup for the server?
Didn't you forgot to mention client/server.c for getting the metaserver
list?
___
Reply to this item at:
2010/8/11 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
On 10 August 2010 20:46, Egor Vyscrebentsov wrote:
Good day!
Are there any thoughts on to support or not to support XDG Base
Directory Specification[1]?
I agree with the idea that one program (Freeciv is considered one
program even though it has
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?1846
Summary: Threads
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wednesday 08/11/2010 at 16:19
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: In
2010/8/11 Marko Lindqvist cazf...@gmail.com:
On 10 August 2010 20:46, Egor Vyscrebentsov evy...@gmail.com wrote:
Good day!
Are there any thoughts on to support or not to support XDG Base
Directory Specification[1]?
I agree with the idea that one program (Freeciv is considered one
program
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #1845 (project freeciv):
Do this allow to do asynchronous DNS lookup for the server?
No, I don't think so. But I already opened ticket patch #1846 about threads
and one thing I was thinking about was metaserver handling.
Didn't you forgot to mention
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #1846 (project freeciv):
Using threads in the server would make the server a lot more scalable, so
this would be a good improvement. I think that having even more granularity
in the server could be investigated, looking for more tasks that could be run
in separate
Update of patch #1454 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1454
___
Message sent
Update of patch #1455 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1455
___
Message sent
Update of patch #1456 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1456
___
Message sent
Update of patch #1453 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?1453
___
Message sent
28 matches
Mail list logo