URL:
  <http://gna.org/bugs/?14118>

                 Summary: wish: AI treaties with allies proposed last
                 Project: Freeciv
            Submitted by: kudra
            Submitted on: Thursday 08/13/2009 at 11:28
                Category: ai
                Severity: 1 - Wish
                Priority: 5 - Normal
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: 
        Operating System: None

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

With 2.1 the following can happen before the user gains control for the turn:
(1) your ally proposes an exchange, (2) you meet your ally's ally and
instantly go to war; your ally cancels the treaty, (3) your ally's ally
proposes a ceasefire.

In this situation, you cannot conclude the treaty with your former ally. 
I've also found that sometimes, you cannot conclude the ceasefire either, but
need to close both proposals and then initiate your own cease-fire proposal. 
The only way the ally's proposal will ever be possible to conclude is if you
conclude a cease-fire, then propose a new alliance, and then return to the
original treaty--but I've found this often doesn't work.

One partial solution would be for the ally's proposal to be the last action
taken before control is given to the user, so that it will be made in light
of any other diplomatic actions taken in the turn.  In the situation
described above, this means that the ally simply wouldn't make the proposal
at all.

However, it's also possible for the player to gain control, then move and
discover another player, before addressing the outstanding treaties.  I would
expect the AI to then cancel any treaties which it proposed but is no longer
willing to agree with, or else to modify them (by adding a proposal of
alliance to the top) to make them acceptable.  This is the only situation I
can think of where the AI proposes a treaty and then doesn't want to conclude
it, so there's not really much reason to leave it open for negotiations.




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/bugs/?14118>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to