[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4644] Consider amphibious defenders

2014-04-19 Thread Emmet Hikory
Update of patch #4644 (project freeciv):

  Status:  Ready For Test = Done   
 Open/Closed:Open = Closed 


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?4644

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4644] Consider amphibious defenders

2014-04-15 Thread Emmet Hikory
Update of patch #4644 (project freeciv):

  Status:None = Ready For Test 
 Assigned to:None = persia 


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?4644

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4644] Consider amphibious defenders

2014-04-15 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4644 (project freeciv):

Is this targeted to 2.6 only? (Please set Planned Release for the patches
you want review comments about, as the branch is quite important factor in how
patch works, and whether it's acceptable)

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?4644

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4644] Consider amphibious defenders

2014-04-15 Thread Emmet Hikory
Update of patch #4644 (project freeciv):

 Planned Release: = 2.6.0  

___

Follow-up Comment #2:

Yes, sorry.  I believe there is too much nativity stuff in the AI to be able
to resolve them for 2.5, as some of the changes will end up being fairly
invasive.

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?4644

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev


[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4644] Consider amphibious defenders

2014-04-04 Thread Emmet Hikory
URL:
  http://gna.org/patch/?4644

 Summary: Consider amphibious defenders
 Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: persia
Submitted on: Sat 05 Apr 2014 04:51:28 AM JST
Category: ai
Priority: 5 - Normal
  Status: None
 Privacy: Public
 Assigned to: None
Originator Email: 
 Open/Closed: Open
 Discussion Lock: Any
 Planned Release: 

___

Details:

The attached patch removes the check to only permit UMT_LAND and UMT_SEA
units as potential defenders in dai_choose_defender_versus().  The intent is
to permit the selection of UMT_BOTH defenders, if they happen to be more
useful.  This has no behavioural effect in the default ruleset, as none of the
UMT_BOTH units are sufficiently good defenders.  I haven't done enough
playtesting with the alien ruleset to be sure, but I suspect that the Rex
remains more interesting than some of the other potential defenders, even with
this change.



___

File Attachments:


---
Date: Sat 05 Apr 2014 04:51:28 AM JST  Name: amphibious-defenders.patch  Size:
1kB   By: persia

http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=20475

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?4644

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev