Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-10-27 Thread Marko Lindqvist
2009/10/8 Pepeto pepet...@gmail.com: Le jeudi 08 octobre 2009 à 13:00 +0300, Marko Lindqvist a écrit : 2009/9/10 Marko Lindqvist cazf...@gmail.com: Network protocol freeze: This means no more changes to mandatory part of capstring. Let me know of any needs to change network protocol before

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-10-27 Thread Pepeto
Le mardi 27 octobre 2009 à 13:04 +0300, Marko Lindqvist a écrit : 2009/10/8 Pepeto pepet...@gmail.com: Le jeudi 08 octobre 2009 à 13:00 +0300, Marko Lindqvist a écrit : 2009/9/10 Marko Lindqvist cazf...@gmail.com: Network protocol freeze: This means no more changes to mandatory part of

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-10-21 Thread Marko Lindqvist
2009/10/20 Pepeto pepet...@gmail.com: Hello men, could we create metatickets for 2.1.10 release and 2.2-beta1 at gna to see how far are we from it?  Maybe we could create a ticket in tasks? There certainly is enough bugfixes gone in since 2.1.9 to justify 2.1.10 release as soon as possible.

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-10-20 Thread Pepeto
Hello men, could we create metatickets for 2.1.10 release and 2.2-beta1 at gna to see how far are we from it? Maybe we could create a ticket in tasks? Pepeto ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-09-19 Thread David Lowe
On Sep 18, 2009, at 14:40 , Marko Lindqvist wrote: Border system uses real distance, not the number of moves unit needs to travel between tiles nor manhattan distance. After a period of lurking, at last i am moved to speak out. I believe the border should be pushed out more

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-09-18 Thread Marko Lindqvist
2009/9/10 John Wilson mt.kine...@gmail.com: Maybe new cities shouldn't take away any territory within the city radius, but still be free to take territory that is out of the radius. ... I would not like to see the 2.2 system reverted into something more like 2.1. I think that the borders in

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-09-15 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Am Sunday 13 September 2009 18:52:29 schrieben Sie: Actually Freeciv will read default ruleset first. Maybe freeze ruleset and make new option optional - default value would be set in default ruleset. I know it needs a lot of changes, so... something like this is on the way (see patch #1252:

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-09-13 Thread Matthias Pfafferodt
Am Thursday 10 September 2009 15:42:56 schrieb Marko Lindqvist: 2009/9/5 Marko Lindqvist cazf...@gmail.com: Ruleset format freeze: Do we need to make any changes to ruleset format before 2.2 is released? Let me know of any such patches or plans. Ruleset format freeze means that people can

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-09-10 Thread Marko Lindqvist
2009/9/5 Marko Lindqvist cazf...@gmail.com: Instead of just deciding everything among maintainers, I call all developers to comment on how we approach 2.2 release. ...and nobody commented. I'll add some comments of my own then. Some things that need to be done before 2.2.0: 1) Starting

Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2

2009-09-10 Thread Jordi Negrevernis i Font
En/na Marko Lindqvist ha escrit: 2009/9/5 Marko Lindqvist cazf...@gmail.com: Instead of just deciding everything among maintainers, I call all developers to comment on how we approach 2.2 release. ...and nobody commented. I'll add some comments of my own then. Some things that