On 8/22/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an evening free now, so I can create the release within the
next six hours or so. Just give a green light and I'll do it.
~Daniel
Got preoccupied with RL matters so I
On 8/22/07, Christian Knoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Markstedt wrote on Aug 22, 07:35 (+0900):
Very well, I'll go ahead and do the release today then! In, say, seven
hours or so.
I'd suggest to have a grace period between the time you're (thinking
you're) ready for beta release,
On 8/22/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an evening free now, so I can create the release within the
next six hours or so. Just give a green light and I'll do it.
~Daniel
Got preoccupied with RL matters so I won't have time tonight after
all. Will try again in 24 hrs!
(PR#39596) 2.1.0 capability cleanup
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
On 8/21/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(PR#39596) 2.1.0 capability cleanup
Good. So what's left to do before release? Your po cleanup, Marko?
~Daniel
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
On 21/08/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/21/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(PR#39596) 2.1.0 capability cleanup
Good. So what's left to do before release? Your po cleanup, Marko?
No, po thing cannot continue before release.
Otherwise we need only
On 8/21/07, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/08/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/21/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(PR#39596) 2.1.0 capability cleanup
Good. So what's left to do before release? Your po cleanup, Marko?
No, po thing
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
Fine, I'll schedule a new release for Friday then. Would that give you
enough time to root out any obvious issues?
Friday?!?! I thought we were going to do it yesterday
I'll see whether I can re-architect Pepeto's goto fixes. Cannot promise
anything. But I was
On 21/08/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
Fine, I'll schedule a new release for Friday then. Would that give you
enough time to root out any obvious issues?
I don't expect many issues as we have already been preparing for
release since last week. No
On 8/22/07, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/08/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
Fine, I'll schedule a new release for Friday then. Would that give you
enough time to root out any obvious issues?
I don't expect many issues as we
On 22/08/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/08/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday?!?! I thought we were going to do it yesterday
Daniel? If you reschedule, just let us know in advance.
Eh, I
Marko Lindqvist wrote:
But we agree that earlier release would be better than waiting for
this? I can accept waiting up to Sunday, though.
Oh, absolutely!
The only thing I see is the PR#39599 and PR#39600, as they are needed to
compile
___
On 22/08/07, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I see is the PR#39599 and PR#39600, as they are needed to
compile
Tested that #39600 would not break compilation here. All clients
(gtk/sdl/xaw/ftwl/stub) compile with (or without) it.
...sdl client froze when I
Any ideas regarding PR#39589 (Windows gettext problems)?
The submitted gettext.m4 patch still doesn't completely solve the
detection problem, since it might now be possible (but on Windows
only) that gettext gets falsely detected in libintl even if the
libintl.a file is actually missing (but
Daniel Markstedt wrote on Aug 22, 07:35 (+0900):
Very well, I'll go ahead and do the release today then! In, say, seven
hours or so.
I'd suggest to have a grace period between the time you're (thinking
you're) ready for beta release, and the actual release, of 1 to 3 days,
to give people with
On 8/19/07, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/08/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Less than 24h remain until the time when I intended to create the
2.1.0-beta6 release. However, Marko has asked me to postpone it to
sort out a network protocol incompatibility issue,
On 20/08/07, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/08/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a ticket for the network compatibility issue in the tracker,
so I can know when it has been resolved?
I'll create one tonight.
Probably not. RL reasons.
- ML
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
Less than 24h remain until the time when I intended to create the
2.1.0-beta6 release. However, Marko has asked me to postpone it to
sort out a network protocol incompatibility issue, so I won't force
that deadline.
What other critical issues remain to get this out
On 19/08/07, Daniel Markstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Less than 24h remain until the time when I intended to create the
2.1.0-beta6 release. However, Marko has asked me to postpone it to
sort out a network protocol incompatibility issue, so I won't force
that deadline.
What other critical
19 matches
Mail list logo