:
https://bugs.debian.org/757858
Might be worth keeping an eye on that, to ensure ejabberd makes it
back into testing before the freeze.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
be backported. A patch to
apt proper will take some time to get into real apt, and then Debian
wheezy users can't benefit.
Also, it's probably harder to mess up this way - it's very obvious when
looking at the URLs fly past that they're coming via tor.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
go over Tor.
Apart from anything else, there will be no UDP support, so it would be
more difficult to get e.g. VoIP working, I think.
A third idea: if we could guarantee that apt was always called via
plinth, then we could always call it via torify or something. Ugly. :)
--
Tim Retout dioc
On 20 Mar 2014 14:22, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
These are all avahi and rsyslog related messages since the last boot.
Do not see anything obvious there, I must admit.
For the record, I can't see anything there either. I have seen occasional
problems in my own testing when the
On 20 Mar 2014 10:36, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
I agree that avahi/mdns would be very useful, and will change
freedombox-setup to pull in avahi-daemon, avahi-utils and libnss-mdns
on the freedombox.
This is now in place, and freshly built images (or
On 17 Mar 2014 22:06, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
[Alberto Fuentes]
echo fb ip fbx /etc/hosts
then navigate to fbx
You are right. This actually work. When I visit
http://eth0-ip-on-freedombox/, I get the redirect to 403 Forbidden. If
I add fbx to /etc/hosts on my
-facing?
If it's being exposed via pagekite etc., it would be worth checking
whether denyhosts is going to do the right thing (i.e. block the
connecting IP, not the proxy's IP, if you see what I mean).
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox
expect to get publicised soon, and in the meantime their newsletter
lets you know when new videos are up. I hope this email wasn't too
off-topic.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to offer
publically-available services that existing IPv4 mail servers could talk
to? Does NAT64 have to be offered by your ISP?
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Freedombox-discuss
. This is where
tools like Pagekite come in, and I can't see how I'd achieve this with
IPv6.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 23:57 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Tim Retout]
Future extensions:
==
[...]
- How would services on public IPs be offered? (UPnP to punch
through the router, and then Freedombuddy tells others about them?)
I suspect something like pagekite
accessible by IPv4-only users?
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/freedombox-discuss
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
Freedombox address with their friends? This would also greatly
speed up discovery of other interesting Freedomboxes.
Note that I have not yet figured out how to implement any of the above!
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
on - many people might find
that useful, and you could achieve the goal of attracting more people to
the project. How cross-platform can this be made?
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(NSFW, slide 137
onwards)
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On 7 Oct 2013 10:58, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
Is the complete silence on this issue an indicator that no-one is
maintaining the freedombox-privoxy package any more? If so, what should
the project do about it?
Yes, I suspect this is
the case.
I have been looking at the rules
On 7 Oct 2013 13:19, I wrote:
As for what we do about it, I am not sure.
Actually, I have an opinion: plinth/freedom-maker should be set up to use
the normal Debian privoxy package. This lets development continue while we
figure out if/how to move the freedombox-specific rules upstream.
Tim
anyway, so I doubt there's much
point from an anonymity point of view.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
On 25 Sep 2013 11:07, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
If Nick find time to merge a bit more patches to Plinth soon, we
should wait for the new upstream version from him, but if he continue
to be busy, I believe we should upload anyway to get the package into
Debian to get a slot in
On 17 Sep 2013 15:32, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
or by configuring privoxy, dnsmasq and redsocks with iptables to pass
all traffic passing through the Freedombox via Tor.
Is there some reason not to do this by default?
Hi!
There are some good reasons not to run unencrypted
or nginx, then it would make sense to use
FastCGI or mod_wsgi in daemon mode rather than CGI, to avoid having to
use mod_suexec or grant these sudo rights to the web server.
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox
On 3 Sep 2013 08:10, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
What I am thinking is a CGI interface run as an isolated user (e.g. via
uwsgi or apache2-suexec) talking to debconf.
Hi! My thoughts:
1. Presumably debconf needs root privileges, so would you grant that user
some limited sudo rights?
/freedombox-discuss
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
-config package contains cfengine scripts. Perhaps that is
the way forward?
Kind regards,
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
modules from there?
Surely (in the long term) the modules should be uploaded to a mirror
as e.g. freedombox-module-ical, and should be installed via apt?
Kind regards,
--
Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox
.img file which can be imported in virt-manager.
I think it would be possible to use qemu-img to convert it to a
smaller format.
So, this makes me think that I should split out the VM image
generation in the Makefile, and create a new KVM target.
Kind regards,
--
Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk
On 20 Jul 2013 19:38, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Perl module [Data::UUID::MT] includes in its documentation a comparison
between Perl-based UUID generators, including weak uses of random data
and details like For libuuid based modules, Version 1 UUIDs will
include the actual MAC
28 matches
Mail list logo
